15
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares

      PUBLISH WITH US

      Your partner in publishing in the Humanities and Social Sciences for over 50 years
      Click HERE to learn more about publishing with us 

       

      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Book Chapter: found
      Deep Ecology, Business Ethics and Personal Responsibility : Selected Papers (1988–2020) 

      From the Art of Reading to the Art of Leading: An Aristotelian Argument for Why Leaders Should Read Literature

      ,
      Peter Lang

      Read this book at

      Buy book Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this book yet. Authors can add summaries to their books on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          This article explores how literature can be a source for developing the ethical competence of leaders. Leadership ethics is an integral part of leadership itself, and it refers to dimensions of ethicality in leadership behaviour, choice, and decisions. A fundamental problem in leadership ethics is how leaders can develop ethical competence and wisdom. In this article, we argue that literature can be a valuable source of ethical competence (see for example Ghesquière and Ims, 2010), and we explore several dichotomies of literature that are particularly important from the point of view of ethics in general and the development of ethical competence in particular.

          Related collections

          Most cited references36

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Moral disengagement in the perpetration of inhumanities.

          Moral agency is manifested in both the power to refrain from behaving inhumanely and the proactive power to behave humanely. Moral agency is embedded in a broader sociocognitive self theory encompassing self-organizing, proactive, self-reflective, and self-regulatory mechanisms rooted in personal standards linked to self-sanctions. The self-regulatory mechanisms governing moral conduct do not come into play unless they are activated, and there are many psychosocial maneuvers by which moral self-sanctions are selectively disengaged from inhumane conduct. The moral disengagement may center on the cognitive restructuring of inhumane conduct into a benign or worthy one by moral justification, sanitizing language, and advantageous comparison; disavowal of a sense of personal agency by diffusion or displacement of responsibility; disregarding or minimizing the injurious effects of one's actions; and attribution of blame to, and dehumanization of, those who are victimized. Many inhumanities operate through a supportive network of legitimate enterprises run by otherwise considerate people who contribute to destructive activities by disconnected subdivision of functions and diffusion of responsibility. Given the many mechanisms for disengaging moral control, civilized life requires, in addition to humane personal standards, safeguards built into social systems that uphold compassionate behavior and renounce cruelty.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Book: not found

            The psychology of personal constructs

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Book: not found

              The tacit dimension

                Bookmark

                Author and book information

                Contributors
                Role: Author
                Role: Author
                Book Chapter
                : 697
                10.3726/9781800792302.003.0032
                0a3205c6-a97c-4954-88cc-3b85cbf35e9e
                History

                Comments

                Comment on this book

                Book chapters

                Similar content44