0
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Book Chapter: found
      Is Open Access
      Voices in Psychosis : Interdisciplinary Perspectives 

      Bridging the Gap in Common Ground When Talking about Voices

      edited_book
      Oxford University PressOxford

      Read this book at

      Buy book Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this book yet. Authors can add summaries to their books on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The Voices in Psychosis transcripts capture voice-hearers’ efforts to express their experiences. This chapter suggests that these voice-hearers are in a tricky linguistic predicament. Talking about our experiences is grounded, among other things, in the assumption that others have similar experiences to us (a specific instance of a general principle of communication known as ‘grounding’). When it comes to voice-hearing, this assumption does not hold. How is this gap in common ground bridged? One might think that the use of metaphor and other figurative forms (like simile) is one way of doing so. However, in these transcripts, large numbers of metaphors are not seen. This chapter explores why this might be the case.

          Related collections

          Most cited references10

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          EASE: Examination of Anomalous Self-Experience.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Experiences of hearing voices: analysis of a novel phenomenological survey

            Summary Background Auditory hallucinations—or voices—are a common feature of many psychiatric disorders and are also experienced by individuals with no psychiatric history. Understanding of the variation in subjective experiences of hallucination is central to psychiatry, yet systematic empirical research on the phenomenology of auditory hallucinations remains scarce. We aimed to record a detailed and diverse collection of experiences, in the words of the people who hear voices themselves. Methods We made a 13 item questionnaire available online for 3 months. To elicit phenomenologically rich data, we designed a combination of open-ended and closed-ended questions, which drew on service-user perspectives and approaches from phenomenological psychiatry, psychology, and medical humanities. We invited people aged 16–84 years with experience of voice-hearing to take part via an advertisement circulated through clinical networks, hearing voices groups, and other mental health forums. We combined qualitative and quantitative methods, and used inductive thematic analysis to code the data and χ2 tests to test additional associations of selected codes. Findings Between Sept 9 and Nov 29, 2013, 153 participants completed the study. Most participants described hearing multiple voices (124 [81%] of 153 individuals) with characterful qualities (106 [69%] individuals). Less than half of the participants reported hearing literally auditory voices—70 (46%) individuals reported either thought-like or mixed experiences. 101 (66%) participants reported bodily sensations while they heard voices, and these sensations were significantly associated with experiences of abusive or violent voices (p=0·024). Although fear, anxiety, depression, and stress were often associated with voices, 48 (31%) participants reported positive emotions and 49 (32%) reported neutral emotions. Our statistical analysis showed that mixed voices were more likely to have changed over time (p=0·030), be internally located (p=0·010), and be conversational in nature (p=0·010). Interpretation This study is, to our knowledge, the largest mixed-methods investigation of auditory hallucination phenomenology so far. Our survey was completed by a diverse sample of people who hear voices with various diagnoses and clinical histories. Our findings both overlap with past large-sample investigations of auditory hallucination and suggest potentially important new findings about the association between acoustic perception and thought, somatic and multisensorial features of auditory hallucinations, and the link between auditory hallucinations and characterological entities. Funding Wellcome Trust.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Shattering the Bell Jar: Metaphor, Gender, and Depression

                Bookmark

                Author and book information

                Book Chapter
                September 8 2022
                : 134-C16.P36
                10.1093/oso/9780192898388.003.0016
                62f8cc98-f860-427f-acf6-a8bc373f0071
                History

                Comments

                Comment on this book

                Book chapters

                Similar content36