31
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Book Chapter: not found
      The Oxford Handbook of Psychology and Law 

      Human Factors in Forensic Science

      edited-book
      ,
      Oxford University Press

      Read this book at

      Publisher
      Buy book
          There is no author summary for this book yet. Authors can add summaries to their books on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Forensic science evidence has long been accepted in court and is widely considered infallible. However, the forensic sciences have recently come under intense scrutiny, as forensic science errors have been implicated in an alarming number of wrongful convictions. In working to better understand and prevent such errors, researchers have discovered that they are often an unfortunate by-product of innate psychological processes. This chapter first reviews evidence that forensic science examiners, like all humans, are vulnerable to unconscious biases that can lead to erroneous judgments. Second, the chapter identifies barriers to mitigating the pernicious effects of bias in forensic laboratories and courtrooms, including widespread misconceptions about its causes and effects. Third, proposed reforms are offered to strengthen forensic science, with descriptions of some progress that has already been made in that regard.

          Related collections

          Most cited references172

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Confirmation bias: A ubiquitous phenomenon in many guises.

            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Value and need as organizing factors in perception.

              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Contextual information renders experts vulnerable to making erroneous identifications.

              We investigated whether experts can objectively focus on feature information in fingerprints without being misled by extraneous information, such as context. We took fingerprints that have previously been examined and assessed by latent print experts to make positive identification of suspects. Then we presented these same fingerprints again, to the same experts, but gave a context that suggested that they were a no-match, and hence the suspects could not be identified. Within this new context, most of the fingerprint experts made different judgements, thus contradicting their own previous identification decisions. Cognitive aspects involved in biometric identification can explain why experts are vulnerable to make erroneous identifications.

                Author and book information

                Book Chapter
                February 23 2023
                : 621-C36P212
                10.1093/oxfordhb/9780197649138.013.36
                c82390e5-d4fc-494a-8fd8-236c522a751d
                History

                Comments

                Comment on this book