Drug-induced Nail Changes

The associations between toenail levels of five trace elements and breast cancer risk were studied among a cohort of 62,641 US women who provided toenail clippings and were free from diagnosed breast cancer in 1982. Among 433 cases of breast cancer identified during 4 years of follow-up and their matched controls, the odds ratios comparing the highest with the lowest quintiles and adjusted for established breast cancer risk factors were as follows: for arsenic, 1.12 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.66-1.91); for copper, 0.91 (95% CI 0.59-1.42); for chromium, 0.96 (95% CI 0.61-1.52); for iron, 0.89 (95% CI 0.56-1.40); and for zinc, 1.09 (95% CI 0.70-1.70). Among postmenopausal women, a marginally significant positive association was observed between toenail chromium levels and breast cancer risk (odds ratio = 1.71, 95% CI 0.87-3.35) (p for trend = 0.07). However, the association between chromium and breast cancer risk was inverse among premenopausal women. Although data on the validity of toenail levels of certain of these elements are limited, these results do not provide evidence for an important effect of arsenic, copper, chromium, iron, or zinc on breast cancer risk.

We conducted a phase II study designed to evaluate the activity, safety, and tolerability of docetaxel (Taxotere: Rhône-Poulenc Rorer Pharmaceuticals Inc, Collegeville, PA) in patients with advanced, incurable, or recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN) who had not received prior palliative chemotherapy. Thirty-one patients with measurable, locoregional, or metastatic SCCHN were treated with docetaxel, administered at a dose of 100 mg/m2 as a 1-hour intravenous (i.v.) infusion once every 21 days on an outpatient basis. All patients were premedicated with dexamethasone, diphenhydramine, and cimetidine. Prophylactic administration of growth factors or antiemetics was not permitted. Thirty-one patients were treated. Twenty-nine patients were assessable for response and 30 for toxicity. Four of 31 patients (13%) achieved complete response (CR), nine (29%) achieved partial response had stable disease (SD) and seven (23%) experienced progression of disease (PD). The major response rate was 42% (95% confidence interval [CI], 24% to 60%). The median duration of responses was 5 months (range, 2 to 14). The principal toxicity was leukopenia, which occurred with rapid onset and brief duration. Sixteen patients (53%) experienced nadir fever, and 13 required dose reduction. Hypersensitivity reactions occurred in four patients. Grade 3 peripheral neuropathy occurred in two patients; grade 2 or 3 fatigue occurred in six (20%) and 10 (33%), respectively. Minimal edema (grade 1) occurred in five patients (17%). Clinically significant mucositis, diarrhea, or dermatitis were not observed. Docetaxel has major activity against SCCHN. It appears to be well tolerated in this group of patients and can be safely administered on an outpatient basis. Premedication with dexamethasone, cimetidine, and diphenhydramine is associated with a reduced incidence of significant edema, hypersensitivity reactions, and dermatologic toxicities.

Accurate grading of dermatologic adverse events (AE) due to epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitors (EGFRIs) is necessary for drug toxicity determinations, interagent comparisons, and supportive care trials. The most widely used severity grading scale, the National Cancer Institute's Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.0 (NCI-CTCAE v4.0), was not designed specifically for this class of agents and may result in underreporting and poor grading of distinctive adverse events. We believe a class-specific grading scale is needed to help standardize assessment and improve reporting of EGFRI-associated dermatologic AEs. The Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer (MASCC) Skin Toxicity Study Group conducted an international multidisciplinary meeting that included 20 clinicians and researchers from academic centers and government agencies. Experts from different disciplines presented current information specific to EGFRI-induced dermatologic toxicities: grading scale development, pharmacovigilance safety reporting, health-related quality of life, patient reporting, and pharmacology. Group discussions, literature reviews, and professional expertise established the theoretical foundation for the proposed grading scale. A new grading system is proposed for the most common events associated with EGFRI-induced dermatologic AEs: papulopustular reaction or acneiform rash, nail changes, erythema, pruritus, xerosis, hair changes, telangiectasias, hyperpigmentation, mucositis, flushing, radiation dermatitis, hyposalivation, and taste changes. The proposed scale maintains consistency with the grading principles and language of the existing CTCAE version 4.0 and MedDRA terminology and includes relevant patient-reported health-related quality of life factors. A grading scale specific to EGFR inhibitor dermatologic AEs is presented for formal integration into future versions of CTCAE and for validation in clinical trial settings. The study group designed this scale to detect and report EGFRI-related toxicities with greater sensitivity, specificity, and range than the scales currently used. This scale should serve as a foundation for efforts to perform objective interdrug comparisons and assessments of supportive care treatment strategies more effectively than with current methods.