JPM is aimed at academics and students of business, finance, economics and the social sciences, and all those with an interest in the operation of markets and market efficiency.
(publ. by University of Buckingham Press)
The Journal of Prediction Markets is an academic peer reviewed journal publishing articles, both commissioned and submitted, survey articles, case studies and book reviews. The journal will be a general journal publishing articles on every aspect of the study of prediction markets. The journal is aimed at academics and students of business, finance, economics and the social sciences, and all those with an interest in the operation of markets and market efficiency more generally.
Manuscripts are initially screened by the Editor for conformity with aims and scope, then sent to 2 experts in the subject of the article. Reviews are sent double blind. If reviewers conflict, an additional expert is recruited and an editorial decision for acceptance/rejection made on the basis of the complete advice received. Manuscripts are either accepted, accepted conditionally upon minor revision, rejected with an invitation for extensive revision or rejected.
The ethics statements are based on COPE’s Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors.
The editor is responsible for deciding which of the articles submitted to the journal should be published.
The editor may be guided by the policies of the journal's editorial board and constrained by such legal requirements as shall then be in force regarding libel, copyright infringement and plagiarism. The editor may confer with other editors or reviewers in making this decision.
An editor at any time evaluate manuscripts for their intellectual content without regard to race, gender, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnic origin, citizenship, or political philosophy of the authors.
The editor and any editorial staff must not disclose any information about a submitted manuscript to anyone other than the corresponding author, reviewers, potential reviewers, other editorial advisers, and the publisher, as appropriate.
Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not be used in an editor's own research without the express written consent of the author.
Contribution to Editorial Decisions
Peer review assists the editor in making editorial decisions and through the editorial communications with the author may also assist the author in improving the paper.
Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process.
Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. They must not be shown to or discussed with others except as authorized by the editor.
Standards of Objectivity
Reviews should be conducted objectively. Personal criticism of the author is inappropriate. Referees should express their views clearly with supporting arguments.
Acknowledgement of Sources
Reviewers should identify relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors. Any statement that an observation, derivation, or argument had been previously reported should be accompanied by the relevant citation. A reviewer should also call to the editor's attention any substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and any other published paper of which they have personal knowledge.
Disclosure and Conflict of Interest
Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
Authors of reports of original research should present an accurate account of the work performed as well as an objective discussion of its significance. Underlying data should be represented accurately in the paper. A paper should contain sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the work. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behaviour and are unacceptable.
Originality and Plagiarism
The authors should ensure that they have written entirely original works, and if the authors have used the work and/or words of others that this has been appropriately cited or quoted.
Multiple, Redundant or Concurrent Publication
An author should not in general publish manuscripts describing essentially the same research in more than one journal or primary publication. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behaviour and is unacceptable.
Acknowledgement of Sources
Proper acknowledgment of the work of others must always be given. Authors should cite publications that have been influential in determining the nature of the reported work.
Authorship of the Paper
Authorship should be limited to those who have made a significant contribution to the conception, design, execution, or interpretation of the reported study. All those who have made significant contributions should be listed as co-authors. Where there are others who have participated in certain substantive aspects of the research project, they should be acknowledged or listed as contributors.
The corresponding author should ensure that all appropriate co-authors and no inappropriate co-authors are included on the paper, and that all co-authors have seen and approved the final version of the paper and have agreed to its submission for publication.
Statement on Informed Consent and Observation of Human and Animal Rights
All authors of research reports involving human or animal subjects should provide for publication a statement on Informed Consent and institutionally approved observation of human and animal rights
Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest
All authors should disclose in their manuscript any financial or other substantive conflict of interest that might be construed to influence the results or interpretation of their manuscript. All sources of financial support for the project should be disclosed.
Fundamental errors in published works
When an author discovers a significant error or inaccuracy in his/her own published work, it is the author’s obligation to promptly notify the journal editor or publisher and cooperate with the editor to retract or correct the paper.
As part of the submission process, authors are required to check off their submission's compliance with all of the following items, and submissions may be returned to authors that do not adhere to these guidelines.
For further information on below, please follow the link
Leighton Vaughan Williams, University of Nottingham
Eric Zitzewitz, Dartmouth College
Erik Snowberg, Stanford Business School
Justin Wolfers, Wharton School
Koleman Strumpf, University of Kansas School of Business
Martin Spann, LMU Munich
Michael A Smith, Leeds Business School, Leeds Metropolitan University
Emile Servan-Schreiber, News Futures
Paul W Rhode, University of Arizona and NBER
David Paton, Nottingham University Business School
Marco Ottaviani, Kellogg School of Management, Northwestern University
Charles Noussair, Emory University
Robin Hanson, Department of Economics, George Mason University, United States
Bob Hahn, AEI
Olivier Gergaud, Universite de Reims
Bruno Deschamps, University of Bath
Tom Chalmers, University of Buckingham Press, United Kingdom
|ScienceOpen disciplines:||Economic history, Economic development, Economic theory, General economics, Financial economics, Economics|
|Keywords:||Social science, economic theory, market theory, market economics, market trends, predicting markets, market finance, financial theory, financial trends, market investment|