Average rating: | Rated 5 of 5. |
Level of importance: | Rated 5 of 5. |
Level of validity: | Rated 4 of 5. |
Level of completeness: | Rated 5 of 5. |
Level of comprehensibility: | Rated 5 of 5. |
Competing interests: | None |
ScienceOpen disciplines: | Statistics, Law |
Keywords: | human dignity, decent living, poverty, statistics |
This paper has the potential to be accepted, but some important points have to be clarified or fixed before we can proceed and positive action can be taken. The authors seem to disregard or neglect some important results recently achieved in this field. The authors should revise better and more the current literature in the field. Additional attention should be devoted to discussing the solicitation scenario.