Average rating:	    Rated 5 of 5.
Level of importance:	    Rated 5 of 5.
Level of validity:	    Rated 5 of 5.
Level of completeness:	    Rated 5 of 5.
Level of comprehensibility:	    Rated 5 of 5.
Competing interests:	None

Reviewed article

Record: found
Abstract: found
Article: found

Is Open Access

Publishing in transition – do we still need scientific journals?

Alexander Grossmann (corresponding) (2015)

Abstract For decades, scientific journals were the only way to communicate new research findings. Up until today, very little has changed in that respect. The overwhelming majority of all scientific journals still functions as they did in the times when there was no Internet, no social networks, or crowd-based knowledge platforms. Is this form of dissemination of research findings still suitable in the 21st century? The author says: no.

0 comments Cited 2 times     Rated -3 of 5. – based on 1 reviews

Bookmark

Review information

DOI:: 10.14293/S2199-1006.1.SOR-SOCSCI.ACKE0Y.v1.REAGXX

License:

This work has been published open access under Creative Commons Attribution License CC BY 4.0, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Conditions, terms of use and publishing policy can be found at www.scienceopen.com.

Keywords:

Review text

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/332626809_Bye_Bye_Peer-Reviewed_Publishing

Review of 'Publishing in transition – do we still need scientific journals?'

Reviewed article

Publishing in transition – do we still need scientific journals?

Review information

Review text

Comments

Comment on this review

Similar articles 26