Average rating: | Rated 3 of 5. |
Level of importance: | Rated 4 of 5. |
Level of validity: | Rated 3 of 5. |
Level of completeness: | Rated 1 of 5. |
Level of comprehensibility: | Rated 4 of 5. |
Competing interests: | None |
The article announces the funding of a new cyberinfrastructure aimed at capturing a more comprehensive narrative of scientific output. At the time of writing, this environment had not yet been created, but funded. The article provides a solid discussion and motivation of the need for such an environment, which is indeed a rare novelty at this time, however does not provide any further information such as a website or indeed the actual proposal which was funded. Surely these will be published later though. The initiative has great potential for impact.