Average rating: | Rated 4 of 5. |
Level of importance: | Rated 4 of 5. |
Level of validity: | Rated 3 of 5. |
Level of completeness: | Rated 4 of 5. |
Level of comprehensibility: | Rated 4 of 5. |
Competing interests: | None |
In this manuscript, M. Calcagnino et al report a rare case of biventricular arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy. They emphasize the importance of cardiac magnetic resonance and genetic testing for correct diagnosis. The paper is helpful for the clinical practice of cardiology.
I have the following remarks:
A. The auxiliary examination results of the case are comprehensive. However, some vital medical history (eg. alcohol consumption, diabetes etc) and physical examination records should be noted.
B. Since the patient was started on Sotalol 80 mg t.i.d., He was stable and PVCs were reduced. If possible, changes about echocardiography (eg. Two chamber size and EF ) at clinical follow-ups should be mentioned.
C. What’s the opinion of the authors about the criteria of biventricular arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy?
D. Abbreviations should be defined within the text at first use.