Average rating: | Rated 4.5 of 5. |
Level of importance: | Rated 5 of 5. |
Level of validity: | Rated 5 of 5. |
Level of completeness: | Rated 4 of 5. |
Level of comprehensibility: | Rated 4 of 5. |
Competing interests: | None |
The first impression that draws the paper is its smooth progress of language and thought.
The paper is a health policy communique. The authors have tried with their utmost effort to make graphical presentations of the data.
This is more like a conceptual paper than a pure research based. The inference of various convenient literatures has strengthened the defenses of the paper.
The paper has dug out the possible and feasible ways to make the vaccine reach. If this policy is not adopted, there must prevail perils, according to the presentations of data, though the perils are not highlighted so masterfully.
The overall presentation of the data is trusted and there is no clear trace of ambiguity of graphical presentations.