330
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0
shares
    • Review: found
    Is Open Access

    Review of 'Mpemba Effect- the Effect of Time'

    AUTHOR
    Bookmark
    2
    Mpemba Effect- the Effect of TimeCrossref
    Interesting idea that is not thorough enough both phenomenologically and theoretically.
    Average rating:
        Rated 2 of 5.
    Level of importance:
        Rated 2 of 5.
    Level of validity:
        Rated 1 of 5.
    Level of completeness:
        Rated 1 of 5.
    Level of comprehensibility:
        Rated 4 of 5.
    Competing interests:
    None

    Reviewed article

    • Record: found
    • Abstract: found
    • Article: found
    Is Open Access

    Mpemba Effect- the Effect of Time

    This paper concludes that " time is one of the properties of energy, which is the flow rate of energy from object to space or from space to object. When energy flows from object to space, the time on an object is proportional to the energy density inside the object and inversely proportional to the energy density of the space in which the object is located. When energy flows from space to object, the time on an object is inversely proportional to the energy density inside the object and is proportional to the energy density of the space in which the object is located” Using this time characteristic, the Mpemba effect and "inverse" Mpamba effect are analyzed and a reasonable explanation is given.
      Bookmark

      Review information

      10.14293/S2199-1006.1.SOR-PHYS.APXTYIJ.v1.RVEOMT
      This work has been published open access under Creative Commons Attribution License CC BY 4.0, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Conditions, terms of use and publishing policy can be found at www.scienceopen.com.

      Mpemba effect, inverse Mpamba effect, nature of time , time
      Keywords:

      Review text

      The article deals with a still much discussed phenomenon, proposing an experimental method to verify it. Unfortunately, the method is described in a superficial way, while it would be interesting to have a precise experimental method. Furthermore, the proposed idea of ​​making the observer's time a function of the energy of the system is in principle interesting but in my opinion it is poorly addressed. It is in fact necessary to consider that the time of a system undergoes a slowdown compared to an observer on the basis of the energy content that the author has not estimated in any way. In general it would be interesting to estimate how much a variation of a few degrees can actually affect it or not. Furthermore, the author did not take into consideration the thermodynamic aspect of photon exchanges with the external environment. The speed of heat transmission to the outside could in fact vary according to the thermal gradient in which the temporal rhythm of the two systems can differ precisely according to their temperatures, without necessarily having to explain the effect in question. Furthermore, the necessary bibliographic references are also lacking, as some of the author's claims are not so obvious.

      Comments

      The reviewer thinks that this paper presents an interesting idea that is not thorough enough both phenomenologically and theoretically. The author now intends to add the following to the article:

      After careful consideration, the author now gives the following definition of time: “The time on a system (for example, the heat contained in an object in a vacuum, or the total deuterium tritium fusion energy contained in a star) is proportional to the energy per unit area outflow (or inflow) at unit observer’s time. The observer’s time is the time on the observer (such as an atomic clock on Earth).”

      According to Stefan-Boltzmann's law, the total energy radiated from a unit area of a black body with absolute temperature T in unit time (observer’s time) is

      B(T)=σT4                          (1)

      Where σ is the Stefan-Boltzmann constant (also known as the blackbody radiation constant), equal to 5.67×10-8W/(m2·K4), and T is the temperature of the blackbody.

      If we define n as the total number of photons radiated by the unit area of the blackbody with absolute temperature T in all directions of space in unit observer’s time, ν is the average frequency of the photons. t is the time on the observer, s is the surface area of the black body, and t’ is the time on the black body, then we have:

      t'∝ B(T)=σT4=nhν/st              (2)

      For two black bodies at temperatures T1 and T2, we have:

       

      t1' ∝ B(T1)=σT14=nhν1/st        (3)

      and

      t2'∝B(T2)=σT24=nhν2/st            (4)

       

      From equations (3) and (4), it can be obtained:

      t1'/t2'=(T1/T2)4                             (5)

       

      If T1= 373K and T2= 293K, then we have:

       

      t1'/t2'=(T1/T2)4  =2.626

       

      If T1= 10000K, T2= 1000K, then:

       

      t1'/t2'=(T1/T2)4  =10000

       

      From the above analysis, we can conclude that the higher the temperature of the blackbody, the greater the average energy of the photons radiated by the blackbody, the faster the time passes on the blackbody, and the shorter the life of the system.

      Although the blackbody is only an ideal object, any object can be approximated as a blackbody, and its thermal radiation will follow Planck's law. According to Planck's law, the following relation between the radiance rate and wavelength of electromagnetic waves at various temperatures has been plotted:

       

      It is seen from the above figure that the higher the temperature, the shorter the wavelength of the maximum radiation rate λm, the greater the radiance I (λ, T) corresponding to the same wavelength. That is, the higher the temperature, the shorter the wavelength of the light quantum emitted by the object, the greater the radiation rate. The greater the radiation rate of the object, the faster the time on the object.

      According to the gravitational redshift of light, the higher the energy density in space, the lower the frequency of the light quantum emitted by the objects in space, so the higher the spatial energy density, the slower the time on the object in space.

      Because any system (such as the heat of an object, or the deuterium tritium nucleofusion energy of a star) is composed of quantums. So from the above analysis, we can conclude:

      1. The higher the temperature of the object, the greater the average energy of the light quantums emitted, the faster the time passes on the object and the shorter the life of the system.
      2. The higher the energy density of the space, the lower the average frequency of the light quantums radiated by the object in space, the slower the time on the object, and the longer the life of the system.

       

      2021-08-05 10:47 UTC
      +1

      Comment on this review