48
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0
shares
    • Review: found
    Is Open Access

    Review of 'Institutions, infrastructure, and economic growth'

    Bookmark
    4
    Institutions, infrastructure, and economic growthCrossref
    Well-developed structural model of infrastructure and output growth with policy implications
    Average rating:
        Rated 4 of 5.
    Level of importance:
        Rated 5 of 5.
    Level of validity:
        Rated 3 of 5.
    Level of completeness:
        Rated 4 of 5.
    Level of comprehensibility:
        Rated 4 of 5.
    Competing interests:
    None

    Reviewed article

    • Record: found
    • Abstract: not found
    • Article: not found

    Institutions, infrastructure, and economic growth

      Bookmark

      Review information

      10.14293/S2199-1006.1.SOR-UNCAT.A8QKLJ.v1.RREMEW
      This work has been published open access under Creative Commons Attribution License CC BY 4.0, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Conditions, terms of use and publishing policy can be found at www.scienceopen.com.

      Review text

      This paper presents a well-developed structural model of infrastructure and output growth that considers important institutional and economic factors. The use of cross-country estimates provides a useful perspective on the contribution of infrastructure services to GDP, highlighting the potential benefits of investment in infrastructure. The policy implications offered in the paper are also noteworthy, as they suggest avenues for addressing infrastructure inadequacies. However, it would be helpful if the authors provided more detailed explanations of the institutional and economic factors included in the model, as well as the methods used to estimate the model parameters. Additionally, further discussion of the limitations of the model and potential avenues for future research would enhance the paper's overall contribution to the field.

      Comments

      Comment on this review

      Version and Review History