Average rating: | Rated 3 of 5. |
Level of importance: | Rated 3 of 5. |
Level of validity: | Rated 3 of 5. |
Level of completeness: | Rated 3 of 5. |
Level of comprehensibility: | Rated 2 of 5. |
Competing interests: | None |
Regarding importance, the manuscript does not provide useful insights in the management of the condition, but considering the condition's rarity, it is useful to know the possible clinical outcome. In the previous sense, the article is well argued. Regarding completeness, the authors reference the appropriate scholarly context and the authors provide or cite enough information to follow their findings or argumentation. The figures are well displayed and properly described. On the other hand, the language needs corrections by a native English speaker. Please correct the English sentence construction. After the authors provide corrections with the help of a native English speaker, the paper will certainly be more fluent, well-structured and comprehensible.