2021-02-10
Average rating: | Rated 3 of 5. |
Level of importance: | Rated 4 of 5. |
Level of validity: | Rated 2 of 5. |
Level of completeness: | Rated 3 of 5. |
Level of comprehensibility: | Rated 3 of 5. |
Competing interests: | None |
This work has been published open access under Creative Commons Attribution License CC BY 4.0, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Conditions, terms of use and publishing policy can be found at www.scienceopen.com.
Keywords: | doctor-patient interaction, Patients Diagnosis, medical consultation time |
Congradulation for your work.
The presentation need some modificstion. Because, the format used is not appropiate for a scientific article, the format conventionnally used is the IMRAD (introduction: where you briefly present the problematic of your subject, then the justificstion and your objectif or/and your hypothesis; you do not need to present the ltterature review here; the the methode section; your result and discussion.).
Your work seems a decriptive study where a qualitative approach would be better than the quantitative. the chi-square analysis is a little bit low for conclusive evidence, I suggest you to use pearson and spearman correlation test too.