24
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Training community healthcare workers on the use of information and communication technologies: a randomised controlled trial of traditional versus blended learning in Malawi, Africa

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Despite the increasing uptake of information and communication technologies (ICT) within healthcare services across developing countries, community healthcare workers (CHWs) have limited knowledge to fully utilise computerised clinical systems and mobile apps. The ‘Introduction to Information and Communication Technology and eHealth’ course was developed with the aim to provide CHWs in Malawi, Africa, with basic knowledge and computer skills to use digital solutions in healthcare delivery. The course was delivered using a traditional and a blended learning approach.

          Methods

          Two questionnaires were developed and tested for face validity and reliability in a pilot course with 20 CHWs. Those were designed to measure CHWs’ knowledge of and attitudes towards the use of ICT, before and after each course, as well as their satisfaction with each learning approach. Following validation, a randomised controlled trial was conducted to assess the effectiveness of the two learning approaches. A total of 40 CHWs were recruited, stratified by position, gender and computer experience, and allocated to the traditional or blended learning group using block randomisation. Participants completed the baseline and follow-up questionnaires before and after each course to assess the impact of each learning approach on their knowledge, attitudes, and satisfaction. Per-item, pre-post and between-group, mean differences for each approach were calculated using paired and unpaired t-tests, respectively. Per-item, between-group, satisfaction scores were compared using unpaired t-tests.

          Results

          Scores across all scales improved after attending the traditional and blended learning courses. Self-rated ICT knowledge was significantly improved in both groups with significant differences between groups in seven domains. However, actual ICT knowledge scores were similar across groups. There were no significant differences between groups in attitudinal gains. Satisfaction with the course was generally high in both groups. However, participants in the blended learning group found it more difficult to follow the content of the course.

          Conclusions

          This study shows that there is no difference between blended and traditional learning in the acquisition of actual ICT knowledge among community healthcare workers in developing countries. Given the human resource constraints in remote resource-poor areas, the blended learning approach may present an advantageous alternative to traditional learning.

          Electronic supplementary material

          The online version of this article (10.1186/s12909-018-1175-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

          Related collections

          Most cited references20

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          1 million community health workers in sub-Saharan Africa by 2015.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Critical success factors for e-learning in developing countries: A comparative analysis between ICT experts and faculty

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Development and validation of the guideline for reporting evidence-based practice educational interventions and teaching (GREET)

              Background The majority of reporting guidelines assist researchers to report consistent information concerning study design, however, they contain limited information for describing study interventions. Using a three-stage development process, the Guideline for Reporting Evidence-based practice Educational interventions and Teaching (GREET) checklist and accompanying explanatory paper were developed to provide guidance for the reporting of educational interventions for evidence-based practice (EBP). The aim of this study was to complete the final development for the GREET checklist, incorporating psychometric testing to determine inter-rater reliability and criterion validity. Methods The final development for the GREET checklist incorporated the results of a prior systematic review and Delphi survey. Thirty-nine items, including all items from the prior systematic review, were proposed for inclusion in the GREET checklist. These 39 items were considered over a series of consensus discussions to determine the inclusion of items in the GREET checklist. The GREET checklist and explanatory paper were then developed and underwent psychometric testing with tertiary health professional students who evaluated the completeness of the reporting in a published study using the GREET checklist. For each GREET checklist item, consistency (%) of agreement both between participants and the consensus criterion reference measure were calculated. Criterion validity and inter-rater reliability were analysed using intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC). Results Three consensus discussions were undertaken, with 14 items identified for inclusion in the GREET checklist. Following further expert review by the Delphi panelists, three items were added and minor wording changes were completed, resulting in 17 checklist items. Psychometric testing for the updated GREET checklist was completed by 31 participants (n = 11 undergraduate, n = 20 postgraduate). The consistency of agreement between the participant ratings for completeness of reporting with the consensus criterion ratings ranged from 19 % for item 4 Steps of EBP, to 94 % for item 16 Planned delivery. The overall consistency of agreement, for criterion validity (ICC 0.73) and inter-rater reliability (ICC 0.96), was good to almost perfect. Conclusion The final GREET checklist comprises 17 items which are recommended for reporting EBP educational interventions. Further validation of the GREET checklist with experts in EBP research and education is recommended. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12909-016-0759-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                n.mastellos@imperial.ac.uk
                tammybtran@gmail.com
                kanika.dharmayat13@imperial.ac.uk
                e.cecil@imperial.ac.uk
                hlee@lukeinternational.no
                c-peng.wong@imperial.ac.uk
                winniemkandawire@gmail.com
                ngalande.e@mzuni.ac.mw
                wcsg@lukeinternational.no
                vhardy4@uw.edu
                gbchirambo@yahoo.co.uk
                j.odonoghue@imperial.ac.uk
                Journal
                BMC Med Educ
                BMC Med Educ
                BMC Medical Education
                BioMed Central (London )
                1472-6920
                2 April 2018
                2 April 2018
                2018
                : 18
                : 61
                Affiliations
                [1 ]ISNI 0000 0001 2113 8111, GRID grid.7445.2, Global eHealth Unit, Department of Primary Care and Public Health, School of Public Health, , Imperial College London, ; Reynolds Building, London, W6 8RP UK
                [2 ]ISNI 0000 0001 2113 8111, GRID grid.7445.2, Dr Foster Unit, Department of Primary Care and Public Health, School of Public Health, , Imperial College London, ; London, UK
                [3 ]Luke International, Mzuzu, Malawi
                [4 ]GRID grid.442592.c, Department of Information and Communication Technology, , Mzuzu University, ; Mzuzu, Malawi
                [5 ]ISNI 0000000122986657, GRID grid.34477.33, Department of Family Medicine, , University of Washington, ; Seattle, WA USA
                [6 ]GRID grid.442592.c, Faculty of Health Sciences, , Mzuzu University, ; Mzuzu, Malawi
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4573-3657
                Article
                1175
                10.1186/s12909-018-1175-5
                5879741
                29609596
                071f820d-e94a-43b8-9d7c-a8f8b11e62f6
                © The Author(s). 2018

                Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

                History
                : 24 August 2017
                : 20 March 2018
                Funding
                Funded by: 7th Framework Programme
                Award ID: 305292
                Categories
                Research Article
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2018

                Education
                community healthcare workers,developing countries,blended learning,traditional learning,mlearning,ehealth,information and communication technologies

                Comments

                Comment on this article