29
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Hyperalgesic effect induced by barbiturates, midazolam and ethanol: pharmacological evidence for GABA-A receptor involvement

      undefined

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The involvement of GABA-A receptors in the control of nociception was studied using the tail-flick test in rats. Non-hypnotic doses of the barbiturates phenobarbital (5-50 mg/kg), pentobarbital (17-33 mg/kg), and thiopental (7.5-30 mg/kg), of the benzodiazepine midazolam (10 mg/kg) or of ethanol (0.4-1.6 g/kg) administered by the systemic route reduced the latency for the tail-flick response, thus inducing a 'hyperalgesic' state in the animals. In contrast, non-convulsant doses of the GABA-A antagonist picrotoxin (0.12-1.0 mg/kg) administered systemically induced an increase in the latency for the tail-flick response, therefore characterizing an 'antinociceptive' state. Previous picrotoxin (0.12 mg/kg) treatment abolished the hyperalgesic state induced by effective doses of the barbiturates, midazolam or ethanol. Since phenobarbital, midazolam and ethanol reproduced the described hyperalgesic effect of GABA-A-specific agonists (muscimol, THIP), which is specifically antagonized by the GABA-A antagonist picrotoxin, our results suggest that GABA-A receptors are tonically involved in the modulation of nociception in the rat central nervous system

          Related collections

          Most cited references23

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Neurotransmitters in nociceptive modulatory circuits.

          Significant advances have been made in our understanding of nociceptive modulation from RVM. Among the most useful conceptually has been the discovery that there are two classes of modulatory neurons in the RVM that are likely to have opposing actions on nociception: on-cells, which may facilitate nociceptive transmission, and off-cells, which probably have a net inhibitory effect on nociception. The similarity in response properties among the members of each class, their large, somatic "receptive fields," and the wide distribution of the terminal fields of axons of individual neurons to the trigeminal sensory complex and to multiple spinal segments indicate that these neurons exert a global influence over nociceptive responsiveness. Drug microinjections into the RVM presumably shift the balance between states of on- or off-cell firing and also produce measurable changes in the threshold for nocifensor reflexes. The meaningful unit of function in the RVM nociceptive modulatory system therefore probably consists of large ensembles of physiologically and pharmacologically similar neurons. The strong coordination of activity of the two classes of RVM neuron may depend largely upon intranuclear projections from RVM off-cells that excite other off-cells and inhibit on-cells. The off-cell pause is GABA-mediated, and it is likely that there is a subset of GABA-containing RVM on-cells that directly inhibit off-cells. Furthermore, the available evidence indicates that exogenous opiates activate off-cells by inhibiting GABAergic release. Presumably, enkephalinergic cells in the RVM disinhibit off-cells in a similar way. Although non-serotonin-containing off-cells certainly exist, we propose that some off-cells contain serotonin. Other possible connections are based on more limited data; however, ACh, neurotensin, NE, and EAAs are present in neurons that project to the RVM, and each of these compounds, when microinjected into the RVM, has a modulating effect on nociceptive transmission. The local circuits in the RVM that underlie these actions remain to be elucidated. At the level of the dorsal horn, there is good evidence for each of three inhibitory mechanisms: direct inhibition of nociceptive projection neurons, inhibition of excitatory relay interneurons, and excitation of an inhibitory interneuron. The relative contribution made by each of these circuits is unknown.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Neurotransmitters In Nociceptive Modulatory Circuits

            H Fields (1991)
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              GABA receptors: are cellular differences reflected in function?

              The putative involvement of GABAA and GABAB receptors in various behavioral and physiological effects is summarized in Table III. A division of function among the two types of GABA receptors appears to exist. GABAA receptors mediate feeding, cardiovascular regulation, anxiolytic effects, and anticonvulsive activity. GABAB receptors, on the other hand, are involved in analgesia, cardiovascular regulation, and depression. Although there is some overlap and shared functions among the receptor types, it is evident that GABAA and GABAB receptors have different behavioral and physiological profiles. Feeding, anticonvulsive activity and anxiety, for example, primarily involve GABAA receptors. Analgesia and depression, on the other hand, are GABAB effects. In those cases where GABAA and GABAB receptors mediate similar functions (e.g. cardiovascular regulation), they do so by affecting different transmitter systems and cellular mechanisms. It is proposed, therefore, that GABAA and GABAB receptors differ not only at the cellular level, but that they also have different functions in the mammalian central nervous system. The association of different subtypes of a receptor with different functions and mechanisms of action is not unique to the GABA system. D1 and D2 receptors in the dopamine system, for example, also exhibit some separation of function as do the mu, delta and kappa types of opiate receptors. Different subtypes of neurotransmitter receptors, therefore, appear to be a general organizing principle used by the brain to transduce chemical signals into different functional responses. A better understanding of the exact processes through which cellular signals are transformed into functional responses is a goal of future research.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: ND
                Role: ND
                Role: ND
                Role: ND
                Role: ND
                Role: ND
                Journal
                bjmbr
                Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research
                Braz J Med Biol Res
                Associação Brasileira de Divulgação Científica (Ribeirão Preto )
                1414-431X
                February 1997
                : 30
                : 2
                : 251-256
                Article
                S0100-879X1997000200015
                10.1590/S0100-879X1997000200015
                28f4c5be-c711-4c5a-92b9-57d3fb33c5d6

                http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

                History
                Product

                SciELO Brazil

                Self URI (journal page): http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_serial&pid=0100-879X&lng=en
                Categories
                BIOLOGY
                MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL

                Medicine,General life sciences
                barbiturates,midazolam,ethanol,picrotoxin,hyperalgesia,GABA-A receptor
                Medicine, General life sciences
                barbiturates, midazolam, ethanol, picrotoxin, hyperalgesia, GABA-A receptor

                Comments

                Comment on this article