24
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Impact of laparoscopy on the prevention of pulmonary complications after thoracoscopic esophagectomy using data from JCOG0502: a prospective multicenter study

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) are the most common causes of serious morbidity after esophagectomy, which involves both thoracic and abdominal incisions. Although the thoracoscopic approach decreases PPC frequency after esophagectomy, it remains unclear whether the frequency is further decreased by combining it with laparoscopic gastric mobilization. This study aimed to determine the impact of laparoscopy on the prevention of PPCs after thoracoscopic esophagectomy using data from the Japan Clinical Oncology Group Study 0502 (JCOG0502).

          Methods

          JCOG0502 is a four-arm prospective study comparing esophagectomy with definitive chemo-radiotherapy. The use of thoracoscopy and/or laparoscopy was decided at the surgeon’s discretion. PPCs were defined as one or more of the following postoperative morbidities grade ≥2 (as per Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v3.0): pneumonia, atelectasis, and acute respiratory distress syndrome.

          Results

          A total of 379 patients were enrolled in JCOG0502. Of these, 210 patients underwent esophagectomy via thoracotomy with laparotomy ( n = 102), thoracotomy with laparoscopy ( n = 7), thoracoscopy with laparotomy ( n = 43), and thoracoscopy with laparoscopy ( n = 58). PPC frequency was reduced to a greater extent by thoracoscopy than by thoracotomy (thoracoscopy 15.8%, thoracotomy 30.3%; p = 0.015). However, following thoracoscopic esophagectomy, laparoscopy failed to further decrease the PPC frequency compared with laparotomy (laparoscopy 15.5%, laparotomy 16.3%; p = 1.00). Univariable analysis showed that thoracoscopy (shown above) and less blood loss (<350 mL 16.3%, ≥350 mL 30.2%; p = 0.022) were associated with PPC prevention, whereas laparoscopy showed a borderline significant association (laparoscopy 15.4%, laparotomy 26.9%; p = 0.079). Multivariable analysis also showed that thoracoscopy and less blood loss were associated with PPC prevention.

          Conclusion

          Thoracoscopic approach to esophagectomy significantly reduced PPC frequency with minimal additional effect from laparoscopic gastric mobilization.

          Related collections

          Most cited references26

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Minimally invasive versus open oesophagectomy for patients with oesophageal cancer: a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial.

          Surgical resection is regarded as the only curative option for resectable oesophageal cancer, but pulmonary complications occurring in more than half of patients after open oesophagectomy are a great concern. We assessed whether minimally invasive oesophagectomy reduces morbidity compared with open oesophagectomy. We did a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial at five study centres in three countries between June 1, 2009, and March 31, 2011. Patients aged 18-75 years with resectable cancer of the oesophagus or gastro-oesophageal junction were randomly assigned via a computer-generated randomisation sequence to receive either open transthoracic or minimally invasive transthoracic oesophagectomy. Randomisation was stratified by centre. Patients, and investigators undertaking interventions, assessing outcomes, and analysing data, were not masked to group assignment. The primary outcome was pulmonary infection within the first 2 weeks after surgery and during the whole stay in hospital. Analysis was by intention to treat. This trial is registered with the Netherlands Trial Register, NTR TC 2452. We randomly assigned 56 patients to the open oesophagectomy group and 59 to the minimally invasive oesophagectomy group. 16 (29%) patients in the open oesophagectomy group had pulmonary infection in the first 2 weeks compared with five (9%) in the minimally invasive group (relative risk [RR] 0·30, 95% CI 0·12-0·76; p=0·005). 19 (34%) patients in the open oesophagectomy group had pulmonary infection in-hospital compared with seven (12%) in the minimally invasive group (0·35, 0·16-0·78; p=0·005). For in-hospital mortality, one patient in the open oesophagectomy group died from anastomotic leakage and two in the minimally invasive group from aspiration and mediastinitis after anastomotic leakage. These findings provide evidence for the short-term benefits of minimally invasive oesophagectomy for patients with resectable oesophageal cancer. Digestive Surgery Foundation of the Unit of Digestive Surgery of the VU University Medical Centre. Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            POSSUM: a scoring system for surgical audit.

            POSSUM, a Physiological and Operative Severity Score for the enUmeration of Mortality and morbidity, is described. This system has been devised from both a retrospective and prospective analysis and the present paper attempts to validate it prospectively. Logistic regression analysis yielded statistically significant equations for both mortality and morbidity (P less than 0.001). When displayed graphically zones of increasing morbidity and mortality rates could be defined which could be of value in surgical audit. The scoring system produced assessments for morbidity and mortality rates which did not significantly differ from observed rates.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              A risk model for esophagectomy using data of 5354 patients included in a Japanese nationwide web-based database.

              This study aimed to create a risk model of mortality associated with esophagectomy using a Japanese nationwide database.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                +81-89-999-1111 , isnozaki@shikoku-cc.go.jp
                Journal
                Surg Endosc
                Surg Endosc
                Surgical Endoscopy
                Springer US (New York )
                0930-2794
                1432-2218
                4 August 2017
                4 August 2017
                2018
                : 32
                : 2
                : 651-659
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Japan Esophageal Oncology Group of Japan Clinical Oncology Group (JCOG), Tokyo, Japan
                [2 ]ISNI 0000 0004 0618 8403, GRID grid.415740.3, Department of Surgery, , Shikoku Cancer Center Hospital, ; 160 Minami-umemoto, Matsuyama, 791-0280 Japan
                [3 ]ISNI 0000 0001 2168 5385, GRID grid.272242.3, Japan Clinical Oncology Group Data Center, , National Cancer Center, ; Tokyo, Japan
                [4 ]ISNI 0000 0001 2168 5385, GRID grid.272242.3, Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology Division, , National Cancer Center Hospital, ; Tokyo, Japan
                [5 ]ISNI 0000 0001 2168 5385, GRID grid.272242.3, Esophageal Surgery Division, , National Cancer Center Hospital, ; Tokyo, Japan
                [6 ]ISNI 0000 0001 2168 5385, GRID grid.272242.3, Department of Radiation Oncology, , National Cancer Center Hospital, ; Tokyo, Japan
                [7 ]ISNI 0000 0001 2168 5385, GRID grid.272242.3, Esophageal Surgery Division, , National Cancer Center Hospital East, ; Kashiwa, Japan
                [8 ]ISNI 0000 0004 1793 0765, GRID grid.416963.f, Department of Surgery, , Osaka Medical Center for Cancer and Cardiovascular Diseases, ; Osaka, Japan
                [9 ]ISNI 0000 0004 1764 6940, GRID grid.410813.f, Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, , Toranomon Hospital, ; Tokyo, Japan
                [10 ]ISNI 0000 0004 0377 8969, GRID grid.416203.2, Department of Surgery, , Niigata Cancer Center Hospital, ; Niigata, Japan
                [11 ]ISNI 0000 0004 1763 9927, GRID grid.415804.c, Department of Surgery, , Shizuoka General Hospital, ; Shizuoka, Japan
                [12 ]ISNI 0000 0004 1936 9959, GRID grid.26091.3c, Department of Surgery, , Keio University School of Medicine, ; Tokyo, Japan
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8246-5028
                Article
                5716
                10.1007/s00464-017-5716-5
                5772128
                28779246
                63999a42-1340-4548-8293-5db3ce41a918
                © The Author(s) 2017

                Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

                History
                : 22 March 2017
                : 10 July 2017
                Funding
                Funded by: National Cancer Center Research and Development Fund from the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare of Japan
                Award ID: 23-A-19, 23-A-16, 26-A-4
                Funded by: Grants-in-Aid for Cancer Research from the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare of Japan
                Award ID: 20S-3, 18-1
                Categories
                Article
                Custom metadata
                © Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

                Surgery
                minimally invasive esophagectomy,thoracoscopy,laparoscopy,pneumonia,esophageal cancer
                Surgery
                minimally invasive esophagectomy, thoracoscopy, laparoscopy, pneumonia, esophageal cancer

                Comments

                Comment on this article