315
views
1
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    18
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Bottled Water: United States Consumers and Their Perceptions of Water Quality

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Consumption of bottled water is increasing worldwide. Prior research shows many consumers believe bottled water is convenient and has better taste than tap water, despite reports of a number of water quality incidents with bottled water. The authors explore the demographic and social factors associated with bottled water users in the U.S. and the relationship between bottled water use and perceptions of the quality of local water supply. They find that U.S. consumers are more likely to report bottled water as their primary drinking water source when they perceive that drinking water is not safe. Furthermore, those who give lower ratings to the quality of their ground water are more likely to regularly purchase bottle water for drinking and use bottle water as their primary drinking water source.

          Related collections

          Most cited references23

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Book: not found

          Applied Logistic Regression

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Gender differences in risk perception: theoretical and methodological perspectives.

            A substantial body of risk research indicates that women and men differ in their perceptions of risk. This paper discusses how they differ and why. A review of a number of existing empirical studies of risk perception points at several problems, regarding what gender differences are found in such studies, and how these differences are accounted for. Firstly, quantitative approaches, which have so far dominated risk research, and qualitative approaches give different, sometimes even contradictory images of women's and men's perceptions of risk. Secondly, the gender differences that appear are often left unexplained, and even when explanations are suggested, these are seldom related to gender research and gender theory in any systematic way. This paper argues that a coherent, theoretically informed gender perspective on risk is needed to improve the understanding of women's and men's risk perceptions. An analysis of social theories of gender points out some relations and distinctions which should be considered in such a perspective. It is argued that gender structures, reflected in gendered ideology and gendered practice, give rise to systematic gender differences in the perception of risk. These gender differences may be of different kinds, and their investigation requires the use of qualitative as well as quantitative methods. In conclusion, the arguments about gender and risk perception are brought together in a theoretical model which might serve as a starting point for further research.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Fluoride and bacterial content of bottled water vs tap water.

              Bottled water has become a status symbol and is frequently used in place of tap water. While both waters are considered safe to drink, is either more beneficial in preventing tooth decay and is there a difference in purity? To determine the fluoride level and bacterial content of commercially bottled waters municipal tap water and to compare the results. Comparative study. Cleveland, Ohio. Fifty-seven samples of 5 categories of bottled waters were purchased from local stores. Samples of tap water were collected in sterile containers from the 4 local water processing plants. Fluoride levels were determined by an ion-selective electrode method. Water was cultured quantitatively and levels of bacteria were calculated as colony-forming units (CFUs) per milliliter. Fluoride levels and bacterial counts. Fluoride levels within the range recommended for drinking water by the Ohio Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, 0.80 to 1.30 mg/L, were found in only 3 samples of bottled water tested. The fluoride levels of tap water samples were within 0.04 mg/L of the optimal fluoride level of 1.00 mg/L. The bacterial counts in the bottled water samples ranged from less than 0.01 CFU/mL to 4900 CFUs/mL, including 6 samples with levels substantially above 1000 CFUs/mL. In contrast, bacterial counts in samples of tap water ranged from 0.2 to 2.7 CFUs/mL. Five percent of the bottled water purchased in Cleveland fell within the required fluoride range recommended by the state, compared with 100% of the tap water samples, all of which were also within 0.04 mg/L of the optimal fluoride level of 1.00 mg/L. Use of bottled water based on the assumption of purity can be misguided. Recently, the Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, published a final ruling that requires community water systems to regularly report to the public on the quality of local tap water; there are no similar proposals to determine the quality of bottled water through labeling.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Int J Environ Res Public Health
                101238455
                International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
                Molecular Diversity Preservation International (MDPI)
                1661-7827
                1660-4601
                February 2011
                21 February 2011
                : 8
                : 2
                : 565-578
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Sociology, Iowa State University, 103 East Hall, Ames, IA 50011, USA; E-Mail: lwmorton@ 123456iastate.edu
                [2 ] PSES Department, University of Idaho, P.O. Box 442339, Moscow, ID 83844, USA; E-Mail: BMAHLER@ 123456uidaho.edu
                Author notes
                [* ]Author to whom correspondence should be addressed; E-Mail: zhihuahu@ 123456iastate.edu ; Tel.: +1-515-520-0727; Fax: +1-515-294-2303.
                Article
                ijerph-08-00565
                10.3390/ijerph8020565
                3084479
                21556204
                78adb745-5a7c-45b0-aa0d-81beada4ab11
                © 2011 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.

                This article is an open-access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/).

                History
                : 1 January 2011
                : 27 January 2011
                : 15 February 2011
                Categories
                Article

                Public health
                ground water quality,bottled water,water quality perceptions
                Public health
                ground water quality, bottled water, water quality perceptions

                Comments

                Comment on this article