Remote online global health education among U.S. medical students during COVID-19 and beyond

There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

Abstract

Background

Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, the 2021 Harvard Medical School course Clinical Topics in Global Health was offered for the first time as a remote class. We sought to understand student and faculty perceptions of the elective and evaluate the perceived effectiveness of teaching global health using an online education platform.

Methods

Following the course, students and faculty were invited to complete a combined total of three online surveys, which consisted of closed- and open-response questions assessing the strengths and challenges of online learning. Data analyses included traditional descriptive statistics, Net Promoter Score calculation, and inductive thematic analysis of qualitative data.

Results

Thirty-two students and eighteen guest faculty (including four international faculty) participated in the course. Highly-rated course components included guest lecturers, practical skill sessions, polls, and case studies. The Net Promoter Score for the course was excellent at 92, and students reported a greater likelihood of pursuing a career in global health because of the course. While students and faculty highlighted limitations of the remote learning platform (lack of community and interactivity), they also commented on increased accessibility and faculty diversity. Most faculty and students recommended a hybrid model for future versions of the course and suggested strategies to address current limitations.

Conclusions

A remote learning platform can effectively deliver global health education, both in the pandemic setting and beyond.

Supplementary information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12909-022-03434-3.

Related collections

Most cited references 38

Record: found
Abstract: found
Article: found

Is Open Access

Online Learning: A Panacea in the Time of COVID-19 Crisis

Shivangi Dhawan (2020)

Educational institutions (schools, colleges, and universities) in India are currently based only on traditional methods of learning, that is, they follow the traditional set up of face-to-face lectures in a classroom. Although many academic units have also started blended learning, still a lot of them are stuck with old procedures. The sudden outbreak of a deadly disease called Covid-19 caused by a Corona Virus (SARS-CoV-2) shook the entire world. The World Health Organization declared it as a pandemic. This situation challenged the education system across the world and forced educators to shift to an online mode of teaching overnight. Many academic institutions that were earlier reluctant to change their traditional pedagogical approach had no option but to shift entirely to online teaching–learning. The article includes the importance of online learning and Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, & Challenges (SWOC) analysis of e-learning modes in the time of crisis. This article also put some light on the growth of EdTech Start-ups during the time of pandemic and natural disasters and includes suggestions for academic institutions of how to deal with challenges associated with online learning.

0 comments Cited 539 times – based on 0 reviews      Review now

Bookmark

Record: found
Abstract: not found
Article: not found

Critical Inquiry in a Text-Based Environment: Computer Conferencing in Higher Education

D.Randy Garrison, Terry Anderson, David Walter Archer (1999)

0 comments Cited 309 times – based on 0 reviews      Review now

Bookmark

Record: found
Abstract: found
Article: found

Is Open Access

A systematic review of the factors – enablers and barriers – affecting e-learning in health sciences education

Krishna Regmi, Linda Jones (2020)

Background Recently, much attention has been given to e-learning in higher education as it provides better access to learning resources online, utilising technology – regardless of learners’ geographical locations and timescale – to enhance learning. It has now become part of the mainstream in education in the health sciences, including medical, dental, public health, nursing, and other allied health professionals. Despite growing evidence claiming that e-learning is as effective as traditional means of learning, there is very limited evidence available about what works, and when and how e-learning enhances teaching and learning. This systematic review aimed to identify and synthesise the factors – enablers and barriers – affecting e-learning in health sciences education (el-HSE) that have been reported in the medical literature. Methods A systemic review of articles published on e-learning in health sciences education (el-HSE) was performed in MEDLINE, EMBASE, Allied & Complementary Medicine, DH-DATA, PsycINFO, CINAHL, and Global Health, from 1980 through 2019, using ‘Textword’ and ‘Thesaurus’ search terms. All original articles fulfilling the following criteria were included: (1) e-learning was implemented in health sciences education, and (2) the investigation of the factors – enablers and barriers – about el-HSE related to learning performance or outcomes. Following the PRISMA guidelines, both relevant published and unpublished papers were searched. Data were extracted and quality appraised using QualSyst tools, and synthesised performing thematic analysis. Results Out of 985 records identified, a total of 162 citations were screened, of which 57 were found to be of relevance to this study. The primary evidence base comprises 24 papers, with two broad categories identified, enablers and barriers, under eight separate themes: facilitate learning; learning in practice; systematic approach to learning; integration of e-learning into curricula; poor motivation and expectation; resource-intensive; not suitable for all disciplines or contents, and lack of IT skills. Conclusions This study has identified the factors which impact on e-learning: interaction and collaboration between learners and facilitators; considering learners’ motivation and expectations; utilising user-friendly technology; and putting learners at the centre of pedagogy. There is significant scope for better understanding of the issues related to enablers and facilitators associated with e-learning, and developing appropriate policies and initiatives to establish when, how and where they fit best, creating a broader framework for making e-learning effective.

0 comments Cited 156 times – based on 0 reviews      Review now

Bookmark

All references

Author and article information

Contributors

Brett D. Nelson:

ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5049-1798

bnelson1@mgh.harvard.edu

Journal

Journal ID (nlm-ta): BMC Med Educ

Journal ID (iso-abbrev): BMC Med Educ

Title: BMC Medical Education

Publisher: BioMed Central (London )

ISSN (Electronic): 1472-6920

Publication date (Electronic): 10 May 2022

Publication date PMC-release: 10 May 2022

Publication date Collection: 2022

Volume: 22

Electronic Location Identifier: 353

Affiliations

[1 ]GRID grid.32224.35, ISNI 0000 0004 0386 9924, Division of Global Health, Department of Pediatrics, , Massachusetts General Hospital, ; Boston, MA USA

[2 ]GRID grid.38142.3c, ISNI 000000041936754X, Harvard Medical School, ; Boston, MA USA

[3 ]GRID grid.32224.35, ISNI 0000 0004 0386 9924, Division of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, , Massachusetts General Hospital, ; 125 Nashua St Suite 8426, MB Boston, USA

Author information

Peter P. Moschovis https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9664-5959

Anupama Dinesh https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7678-548X

Brett D. Nelson https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5049-1798

Article

Publisher ID: 3434

DOI: 10.1186/s12909-022-03434-3

PMC ID: 9087168

PubMed ID: 35538485

SO-VID: 78fc4eeb-0cdc-4e72-889f-933976903ce9

License:

Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

History

Date received : 8 December 2021

Date accepted : 3 May 2022

Funding

Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100000002, National Institutes of Health;

Award ID: K23ES030399 (PI: Peter Moschovis)

Custom metadata

ScienceOpen disciplines: Education

Keywords: global health,remote learning,clinical skills,covid-19 pandemic

Data availability:

ScienceOpen disciplines: Education

Keywords: global health, remote learning, clinical skills, covid-19 pandemic

Comments

Comment on this article

scite_

Cited by 3

See all cited by

Most referenced authors 275

See all reference authors

- Version 1

Remote online global health education among U.S. medical students during COVID-19 and beyond

Read this article at

Abstract

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Supplementary information

Related collections

Novel Coronavirus Disease COVID-19

Most cited references 38

Online Learning: A Panacea in the Time of COVID-19 Crisis

Critical Inquiry in a Text-Based Environment: Computer Conferencing in Higher Education

A systematic review of the factors – enablers and barriers – affecting e-learning in health sciences education

Author and article information

Contributors

Journal

Affiliations

Author information

Article

History

Funding

Categories

Custom metadata

Comments

Comment on this article

Similar content 144

Cited by 3

Most referenced authors 275