3
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Impact of Comorbidities on Disease Activity, Patient Global Assessment, and Function in Psoriatic Arthritis: A Cross-Sectional Study

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Introduction

          The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of comorbidities on disease activity, patient’s impact of the disease, patient global assessment, and function in psoriatic arthritis (PsA).

          Methods

          Consecutive PsA patients were enrolled in this cross-sectional study. During the visit, the patients underwent a complete physical examination and clinical/laboratory data were collected, including type and number of comorbidities, recorded as simple comorbidity count (SCC).

          Disease activity was assessed using the Disease Activity Score for Psoriatic Arthritis (DAPSA) and the Minimal Disease Activity (MDA) was also evaluated. The Psoriatic Arthritis Impact of Disease (PsAID), the Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI), and the Patient Global Assessment of disease activity (PtGA) were also collected.

          Results

          A total of 144 patients were enrolled. At least one comorbidity was registered in 104 (72.2%) patients. The SCC was associated with DAPSA ( β = 1.48, p = 0.013), PsAID ( β = 0.41, p < 0.01), HAQ-DI ( β = 0.11, p < 0.01) and PtGA ( β = 0.50, p < 0.01). The comorbidities that showed an impact on outcome measures were anxiety and fibromyalgia (FM). Anxiety showed an impact on DAPSA ( β = 14.46, p < 0.001), PsAID ( β = 1.98, p = 0.039) and HAQ-DI ( β = 0.54, p = 0.036). FM showed an impact on DAPSA ( β = 6.46, p = 0.025), PsAID ( β = 2.88, p < 0.001), HAQ-DI ( β = 0.70, p < 0.001), PtGA ( β = 2.00, p = 0.014), and MDA ( β = − 2.79, p = 0.01). The median PtGA value was different among patients with different numbers of comorbidities .

          Conclusions

          This study showed that comorbidities, either as a simple comorbidity count number or as single comorbidity, might have an impact on the main domains affecting PsA patients in real clinical practice.

          Related collections

          Most cited references31

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Classification criteria for psoriatic arthritis: development of new criteria from a large international study.

          To compare the accuracy of existing classification criteria for the diagnosis of psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and to construct new criteria from observed data. Data were collected prospectively from consecutive clinic attendees with PsA and other inflammatory arthropathies. Subjects were classified by each of 7 criteria. Sensitivity and specificity were compared using conditional logistic regression analysis. Latent class analysis was used to calculate criteria accuracy in order to confirm the validity of clinical diagnosis as the gold standard definition of "case"-ness. Classification and Regression Trees methodology and logistic regression were used to identify items for new criteria, which were then constructed using a receiver operating characteristic curve. Data were collected on 588 cases and 536 controls with rheumatoid arthritis (n = 384), ankylosing spondylitis (n = 72), undifferentiated arthritis (n = 38), connective tissue disorders (n = 14), and other diseases (n = 28). The specificity of each set of criteria was high. The sensitivity of the Vasey and Espinoza method (0.97) was similar to that of the method of McGonagle et al (0.98) and greater than that of the methods of Bennett (0.44), Moll and Wright (0.91), the European Spondylarthropathy Study Group (0.74), and Gladman et al (0.91). The CASPAR (ClASsification criteria for Psoriatic ARthritis) criteria consisted of established inflammatory articular disease with at least 3 points from the following features: current psoriasis (assigned a score of 2; all other features were assigned a score of 1), a history of psoriasis (unless current psoriasis was present), a family history of psoriasis (unless current psoriasis was present or there was a history of psoriasis), dactylitis, juxtaarticular new bone formation, rheumatoid factor negativity, and nail dystrophy. These criteria were more specific (0.987 versus 0.960) but less sensitive (0.914 versus 0.972) than those of Vasey and Espinoza. The CASPAR criteria are simple and highly specific but less sensitive than the Vasey and Espinoza criteria.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Psoriatic Arthritis

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Measuring clinical enthesitis in psoriatic arthritis: assessment of existing measures and development of an instrument specific to psoriatic arthritis.

              To assess currently available tools for measurement of enthesitis and to develop a new instrument specifically for use in psoriatic arthritis (PsA). Twenty-eight patients with PsA underwent clinical assessment over a period of 6 months after change of disease-modifying therapy, usually to methotrexate. Measures of enthesitis included the Mander Enthesitis Index (MEI), the Maastricht Ankylosing Spondylitis Enthesitis Score, the Major index, and the Gladman index. Data from these assessments were used to develop a new enthesitis index, the Leeds Enthesitis Index (LEI). An iterative process of data reduction enabled derivation of the LEI index, which consisted of 6 sites: right and left Achilles insertions, medial femoral condyles, and lateral epicondyles of the humerus. All measures showed significant change from baseline but only the LEI and Gladman indices showed a large effect size. All indices demonstrated a floor effect (a score of 0 when the MEI is >0) but this was minimal for the LEI index. All indices correlated strongly with each other and other measures of disease activity. The LEI is a new enthesitis index designed for use in PsA. It shows good test characteristics that suggest it will be a robust and reliable assessment tool. We suggest that it be adopted for use in any randomized controlled trials and longitudinal observation cohorts involving patients with PsA.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                enniolubrano@hotmail.com
                Journal
                Rheumatol Ther
                Rheumatol Ther
                Rheumatology and Therapy
                Springer Healthcare (Cheshire )
                2198-6576
                2198-6584
                17 August 2020
                17 August 2020
                December 2020
                : 7
                : 4
                : 825-836
                Affiliations
                [1 ]GRID grid.10373.36, ISNI 0000000122055422, Academic Rheumatology Unit, Dipartimento Di Medicina E Scienze, , Della Salute “Vincenzo Tiberio”, Università Degli Studi del Molise, ; Campobasso, Italy
                [2 ]GRID grid.410458.c, ISNI 0000 0000 9635 9413, Arthritis Unit, Rheumatology Department, , Hospital Clinic and IDIBAPS, ; Barcelona, Spain
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6189-5328
                Article
                229
                10.1007/s40744-020-00229-0
                7695787
                32804332
                8e4d61a6-54bc-4e65-aa9a-3c9874d36512
                © The Author(s) 2020

                Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.

                History
                : 22 July 2020
                Categories
                Original Research
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2020

                comorbidities,composite indices,function,outcome,patient global assessment,psoriatic arthritis

                Comments

                Comment on this article