14
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Measuring approach–avoidance tendencies towards food with touchscreen-based arm movements

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Most tasks for measuring automatic approach–avoidance tendencies do not resemble naturalistic approach–avoidance behaviors. Therefore, we developed a paradigm for the assessment of approach–avoidance tendencies towards palatable food, which is based on arm and hand movements on a touchscreen, thereby mimicking real-life grasping or warding movements. In Study 1 ( n = 85), an approach bias towards chocolate-containing foods was found when participants reached towards the stimuli, but not when these stimuli had to be moved on the touchscreen. This approach bias towards food observed in grab movements was replicated in Study 2 ( n = 60) and Study 3 ( n = 94). Adding task features to disambiguate distance change through either corresponding image zooming (Study 2) or emphasized self-reference (Study 3) did not moderate this effect. Associations between approach bias scores and trait and state chocolate craving were inconsistent across studies. Future studies need to examine whether touchscreen-based approach–avoidance tasks reveal biases towards other stimuli in the appetitive or aversive valence domain and relate to relevant interindividual difference variables.

          Electronic supplementary material

          The online version of this article (10.1007/s00426-019-01195-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

          Related collections

          Most cited references36

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          Approach, avoidance, and affect: a meta-analysis of approach-avoidance tendencies in manual reaction time tasks

          Approach action tendencies toward positive stimuli and avoidance tendencies from negative stimuli are widely seen to foster survival. Many studies have shown that approach and avoidance arm movements are facilitated by positive and negative affect, respectively. There is considerable debate whether positively and negatively valenced stimuli prime approach and avoidance movements directly (i.e., immediate, unintentional, implicit, automatic, and stimulus-based), or indirectly (i.e., after conscious or non-conscious interpretation of the situation). The direction and size of these effects were often found to depend on the instructions referring to the stimulus object or the self, and on explicit vs. implicit stimulus evaluation. We present a meta-analysis of 29 studies included for their use of strongly positive and negative stimuli, with 81 effect sizes derived solely from the means and standard deviations (combined N = 1538), to examine the automaticity of the link between affective information processing and approach and avoidance, and to test whether it depends on instruction, type of approach-avoidance task, and stimulus type. Results show a significant small to medium-sized effect after correction for publication bias. The strongest arguments for an indirect link between affect and approach-avoidance were the absence of evidence for an effect with implicit evaluation, and the opposite directions of the effect with self and object-related interpretations. The link appears to be influenced by conscious or non-conscious intentions to deal with affective stimuli.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            When do motor behaviors (mis)match affective stimuli? An evaluative coding view of approach and avoidance reactions.

            Affective-mapping effects between affective stimuli and lever movements are critically dependent upon the evaluative meaning of the response labels that are used in the task instructions. In Experiments 1 and 2, affective-mapping effects predicted by specific-muscle-activation and distance-regulation accounts were replicated when the standard response labels towards and away were used but were reversed when identical lever movements were labeled downwards and upwards. In Experiment 3, affective-mapping effects were produced with affectively labeled right and left lever movements that are intrinsically unrelated to approach and avoidance. Experiments 4 and 5 revealed that affective-mapping effects are not mediated by memory retrieval processes and depend on the execution of affectively coded responses. The results support the assumption that evaluative implications of action instructions assign affective codes to motor responses on a representational level that interact with stimulus evaluations on a response selection stage. (c) 2008 APA, all rights reserved
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Approach bias modification training and consumption: A review of the literature.

              Recent theoretical perspectives and empirical evidence have suggested that biased cognitive processing is an important contributor to unhealthy behaviour. Approach bias modification is a novel intervention in which approach biases for appetitive cues are modified. The current review of the literature aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of modifying approach bias for harmful consumption behaviours, including alcohol use, cigarette smoking, and unhealthy eating. Relevant publications were identified through a search of four electronic databases (PsycINFO, Google Scholar, ScienceDirect and Scopus) that were conducted between October and December 2015. Eligibility criteria included the use of a human adult sample, at least one session of avoidance training, and an outcome measure related to the behaviour of interest. The fifteen identified publications (comprising 18 individual studies) were coded on a number of characteristics, including consumption behaviour, participants, task, training and control conditions, number of training sessions and trials, outcome measure, and results. The results generally showed positive effects of approach-avoidance training, including reduced consumption behaviour in the laboratory, lower relapse rates, and improvements in self-reported measures of behaviour. Importantly, all studies (with one exception) that reported favourable consumption outcomes also demonstrated successful reduction of the approach bias for appetitive cues. Thus, the current review concluded that approach bias modification is effective for reducing both approach bias and unhealthy consumption behaviour.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                adrian.meule@sbg.ac.at
                Journal
                Psychol Res
                Psychol Res
                Psychological Research
                Springer Berlin Heidelberg (Berlin/Heidelberg )
                0340-0727
                1430-2772
                4 May 2019
                4 May 2019
                2020
                : 84
                : 7
                : 1789-1800
                Affiliations
                [1 ]GRID grid.7039.d, ISNI 0000000110156330, Department of Psychology, , University of Salzburg, ; Hellbrunner Straße 34, 5020 Salzburg, Austria
                [2 ]GRID grid.7039.d, ISNI 0000000110156330, Center for Cognitive Neuroscience, , University of Salzburg, ; Salzburg, Austria
                [3 ]Schoen Clinic Roseneck, Prien am Chiemsee, Germany
                [4 ]GRID grid.452086.d, ISNI 0000 0001 0738 6733, Department of MultiMedia Technology, , Salzburg University of Applied Sciences, ; Puch, Austria
                [5 ]GRID grid.7450.6, ISNI 0000 0001 2364 4210, Institute of Psychology, , University of Goettingen, ; Göttingen, Germany
                [6 ]GRID grid.5590.9, ISNI 0000000122931605, Behavioural Science Institute, , Radboud University Nijmegen, ; Nijmegen, The Netherlands
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6639-8977
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3926-8533
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3310-8520
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2544-7610
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3820-109X
                Article
                1195
                10.1007/s00426-019-01195-1
                7479004
                31055649
                939c00ba-d3e0-4392-a17c-ced2e2d93265
                © The Author(s) 2019

                Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

                History
                : 13 November 2018
                : 25 April 2019
                Funding
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100010663, H2020 European Research Council;
                Award ID: 639445
                Award Recipient :
                Categories
                Original Article
                Custom metadata
                © Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2020

                Clinical Psychology & Psychiatry
                Clinical Psychology & Psychiatry

                Comments

                Comment on this article