208
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Current imaging techniques in rheumatology: MRI, scintigraphy and PET

      review-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Summary

          The first-line imaging technique for diagnosis inflammation in musculo-skeletal organs in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is planar X-ray examination, which was for many years the first and the only single tool for RA diagnostics and response evaluation. Today, in the era of more aggressive RA treatment, ultrasound examination (US) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are also frequently used. US is used to detect early signs of inflammation within the soft tissue. MRI allows to assess the soft tissue and bone marrow involvement in case of inflammation and/or infection. MRI is capable of detecting more inflammatory lesions and erosions than US, X-ray, or CT. Standard scintigraphy plays a crucial role, and data from positron emission tomography (PET) are also promising. These functional imaging techniques are used in detection of inflammation and/or infection in case of ambiguous results being obtained by other techniques or at other clinics. In patients with RA, scintigraphy plays a key role in the differential diagnosis of hip, knee, etc. endoprosthesis disorders, including mechanical or septic loosening.

          Related collections

          Most cited references34

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Prosthetic joint infections: radionuclide state-of-the-art imaging.

          Prosthetic joint replacement surgery is performed with increasing frequency. Overall the incidence of prosthetic joint infection (PJI) and subsequently prosthesis revision failure is estimated to be between 1 and 3%. Differentiating infection from aseptic mechanical loosening, which is the most common cause of prosthetic failure, is especially important because of different types of therapeutic management. Despite a thorough patient history, physical examination, multiple diagnostic tests and complex algorithms, differentiating PJI from aseptic loosening remains challenging. Among imaging modalities, radiographs are neither sensitive nor specific and cross-sectional imaging techniques, such as computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging, are limited by hardware-induced artefacts. Radionuclide imaging reflects functional rather than anatomical changes and is not hampered by the presence of a metallic joint prosthesis. As a result scintigraphy is currently the modality of choice in the investigation of suspected PJI. Unfortunately, there is no true consensus about the gold standard technique since there are several drawbacks and limitations inherent to each modality. Bone scintigraphy (BS) is sensitive for identifying the failed joint replacement, but cannot differentiate between infection and aseptic loosening. Combined bone/gallium scintigraphy (BS/GS) offers modest improvement over BS alone for diagnosing PJI. However, due to a number of drawbacks, BS/GS has generally been superseded by other techniques but it still may have a role in neutropenic patients. Radiolabelled leucocyte scintigraphy remains the gold standard technique for diagnosing neutrophil-mediated processes. It seems to be that combined in vitro labelled leucocyte/bone marrow scintigraphy (LS/BMS), with an accuracy of about 90%, is currently the imaging modality of choice for diagnosing PJI. There are, however, significant limitations using in vitro labelled leucocytes and considerable effort has been devoted to developing alternative radiotracers, such as radiolabelled HIGs, liposomes, antigranulocyte antibodies and fragments, as well as more investigational tracers such as radiolabelled antibiotics, antimicrobial peptides, bacteriophages and thymidine kinase. On the other hand, positron emission tomography (PET) is still growing in the field of PJI imaging with radiotracers such as (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG), (18)F-FDG white blood cells and (18)F-fluoride. But unfortunately this superb tomographic technique will only receive full acceptance when specific PET uptake patterns can be successfully developed. The emergence of hybrid modality imaging using integrated single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) and PET with computed tomography (SPECT/CT and PET/CT) may also have a contributing role for more accurate assessment of joint replacement complications, especially combined with new radiotracers such as (68)Ga and (64)Cu. Finally, in searching for infection-specific tracers, currently there is no such diagnostic agent available.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Quantification of inflammation in the wrist with gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging and PET with 2-[F-18]-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose.

            To quantify the activity of joint inflammation with magnetic resonance (MR) imaging and positron emission tomography (PET). Gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging and 2-[fluorine-18]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose (FDG) PET of the wrist were performed prospectively in 12 patients receiving antiinflammatory therapy. Patients were studied three times: off medications for 2 weeks, after 2 weeks of treatment with prednisone or nonsteroid antiinflammatory drugs, and after 12 weeks of treatment with methotrexate. Volume of enhancing pannus (VEP) was determined from fat-suppressed MR images (12 patients). FDG uptake was calculated from PET images (11 patients). VEP and FDG uptake were closely correlated (r > .86, P .91, P .05). Contrast material-enhanced MR imaging and PET allow quantification of volumetric and metabolic changes in joint inflammation and comparison of efficacies of antiinflammatory drugs.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              SPECT/CT using 67Ga and 111In-labeled leukocyte scintigraphy for diagnosis of infection.

              The present study evaluated the role of SPECT/CT as an adjunct to (67)Ga (GS) or (111)In-labeled white blood cell (WBC) scintigraphy for diagnosis or localization of infection. Eighty-two patients (56 male and 26 female; mean age, 62 y) assessed for known or suspected infectious processes underwent 88 SPECT/CT studies. Forty-seven patients underwent GS SPECT/CT (13 with fever of unknown origin, 21 with suspected osteomyelitis, and 13 with suspected soft-tissue infection), and 35 patients underwent WBC SPECT/CT (24 with suspected vascular graft infection, and 11 with suspected osteomyelitis). Ninety-eight suggestive sites were identified (52 on GS and 46 on WBC). Additional information provided by SPECT/CT for diagnosis or localization of infection, as compared with planar and SPECT scintigraphy, was recorded. The SPECT/CT contribution was analyzed on a patient and site basis and was compared for the 2 tracers and clinical indications. SPECT/CT provided additional information for infection diagnosis and localization in 39 (48%) of 82 patients and in 47 (48%) of 98 sites. SPECT/CT defined the extent of infection in 35 patients (43%) in 43 sites (44%) and excluded infection in 4 suggestive sites defined as physiologic bowel uptake on GS. SPECT/CT was incorrect in 2 suggestive sites (1 GS and 1 WBC). The contribution of SPECT/CT was significantly higher for WBC than for GS (P < 0.05)--in 63% versus 36% of patients, respectively, and in 61% versus 36% of sites, respectively. SPECT/CT made an incremental contribution to GS and WBC in 48% of patients with suspected infections, by improving diagnosis, localization, and definition of extent of disease. SPECT/CT has an important role mainly with highly specific, low-background infection-seeking tracers such as WBC.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Pol J Radiol
                Pol J Radiol
                Pol J Radiol
                Polish Journal of Radiology
                International Scientific Literature, Inc.
                1733-134X
                1899-0967
                Jul-Sep 2013
                : 78
                : 3
                : 48-56
                Affiliations
                [1 ] Department of Radiology, Institute of Rheumatology, Warsaw, Poland
                [2 ] Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medical Science, University of Varmia and Masuria, Olsztyn, Poland
                Author notes
                Author’s address: Jarosław B. Ćwikła, Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medical Science, University of Varmia and Masuria, Żołnierska 15C Str., Olsztyn, Poland; e-mail jbcwikla@ 123456interia.pl
                Article
                poljradiol-78-3-48
                10.12659/PJR.889138
                3789933
                9de86289-0a07-4a9e-a44f-dff38832e85d
                © Pol J Radiol, 2013

                This is an open access article. Unrestricted non-commercial use is permitted provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 11 March 2013
                : 14 May 2013
                Categories
                Review Article

                Radiology & Imaging
                rheumatoid arthritis,imaging: x-ray,ct,mri,scintigraphy,pet
                Radiology & Imaging
                rheumatoid arthritis, imaging: x-ray, ct, mri, scintigraphy, pet

                Comments

                Comment on this article