4
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Safety of Therapeutic Apheresis in Children and Adolescents

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Therapeutic apheresis (TA) is based on the principles of either removing dissolved pathogenic substances (e.g., antibodies) from the blood plasma or replacing plasma factors. It expands the therapeutic scope for a variety of diseases. Safety analysis in the pediatric field are scant. The aim of this analysis was to analyze specific complications of TA modalities – plasma exchange (PE) and immunoadsorption (IA) – in children and adolescents.

          Methods

          Children and adolescents ( n = 298) who had received TA from 2008 to 2018 in five pediatric nephrology centers were analyzed retrospectively. In total, 4.004 treatments (2.287 PE and 1.717 IA) were evaluated.

          Results

          Indications for TA were mainly nephrological and neurological diseases. The three main indications were antibody-mediated graft rejection (13.4%), hemolytic uremic syndrome mainly with neurological involvement (12.8%), and AB0-incompatible transplantation (11.7%). Complications developed in 440 of the 4004 sessions (11%), of which one third were non-specific (nausea, headache). IA was better tolerated than PE. Complications were reported in 9.5% ( n = 163) of the IA versus 12.1% (277) of the PE sessions ( p < 0.001). When considering different types of complications, significantly more non-specific/non-allergic events ( p = 0.02) and allergic reactions occurred in PE sessions ( p < 0.001). More complications occurred with PE, when using fresh frozen plasma (16.2%; n = 145) in comparison to human albumin (14.5%; n = 115) ( p < 0.001).

          Conclusions

          Therapeutic apheresis in childhood and adolescence is a safe treatment procedure. IA showed a lower complication rate than PE. Therefore, IA may be preferably provided if the underlying disease pathomechanisms do not require PE.

          Related collections

          Most cited references18

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Guidelines on the Use of Therapeutic Apheresis in Clinical Practice - Evidence-Based Approach from the Writing Committee of the American Society for Apheresis: The Eighth Special Issue.

          The American Society for Apheresis (ASFA) Journal of Clinical Apheresis (JCA) Special Issue Writing Committee is charged with reviewing, updating and categorizing indications for the evidence-based use of therapeutic apheresis (TA) in human disease. Since the 2007 JCA Special Issue (Fourth Edition), the committee has incorporated systematic review and evidence-based approaches in the grading and categorization of apheresis indications. This Eighth Edition of the JCA Special Issue continues to maintain this methodology and rigor in order to make recommendations on the use of apheresis in a wide variety of diseases/conditions. The JCA Eighth Edition, like its predecessor, continues to apply the category and grading system definitions in fact sheets. The general layout and concept of a fact sheet that was introduced in the Fourth Edition, has largely been maintained in this edition. Each fact sheet succinctly summarizes the evidence for the use of TA in a specific disease entity or medical condition. The Eighth Edition comprises 84 fact sheets for relevant diseases and medical conditions, with 157 graded and categorized indications and/or TA modalities. The Eighth Edition of the JCA Special Issue seeks to continue to serve as a key resource that guides the utilization of TA in the treatment of human disease.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            International Consensus Recommendations for the Treatment of Pediatric NMDAR Antibody Encephalitis

            Objective To create an international consensus treatment recommendation for pediatric NMDA receptor antibody encephalitis (NMDARE). Methods After selection of a panel of 27 experts with representation from all continents, a 2-step Delphi method was adopted to develop consensus on relevant treatment regimens and statements, along with key definitions in pediatric NMDARE (disease severity, failure to improve, and relapse). Finally, an online face-to-face meeting was held to reach consensus (defined as ≥75% agreement). Results Corticosteroids are recommended in all children with NMDARE (pulsed IV preferred), with additional IV immunoglobulin or plasma exchange in severe patients. Prolonged first-line immunotherapy can be offered for up to 3–12 months (oral corticosteroids or monthly IV corticosteroids/immunoglobulin), dependent on disease severity. Second-line treatments are recommended for cases refractory to first-line therapies (rituximab preferred over cyclophosphamide) and should be considered about 2 weeks after first-line initiation. Further immunotherapies for refractory disease 1-3 months after second-line initiation include another second-line treatment (such as cyclophosphamide) and escalation to tocilizumab. Maintenance immune suppression beyond 6 months (such as rituximab redosing or mycophenolate mofetil) is generally not required, except for patients with a more severe course or prolonged impairments and hospitalization. For patients with relapsing disease, second-line and prolonged maintenance therapy should be considered. The treatment of NMDARE following herpes simplex encephalitis should be similar to idiopathic NMDARE. Broad guidance is provided for the total treatment duration (first line, second line, and maintenance), which is dictated by the severity and clinical course (i.e., median 3, 9 and 18 months in the best, average, and worst responders, respectively). Recommendations on the timing of oncologic searches are provided. Conclusion These international consensus recommendations for the management of pediatric NMDARE aim to standardize the treatment and provide practical guidance for clinicians, rather than absolute rules. A similar recommendation could be applicable to adult patients.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Therapeutic Plasma Exchange in Critically Ill Children Requiring Intensive Care.

              To characterize the clinical indications, procedural safety, and outcome of critically ill children requiring therapeutic plasma exchange.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Front Pediatr
                Front Pediatr
                Front. Pediatr.
                Frontiers in Pediatrics
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                2296-2360
                12 April 2022
                2022
                : 10
                : 850819
                Affiliations
                [1] 1Pediatric Nephrology, Children’s and Adolescents’ Hospital, University Hospital of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine, University of Cologne , Cologne, Germany
                [2] 2Department of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Nephrology and Metabolic Diseases, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin , Berlin, Germany
                [3] 3Pediatric Nephrology, University Hospital for Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine , Heidelberg, Germany
                [4] 4University Medical Centre Hamburg-Eppendorf, University Children’s Hospital , Hamburg, Germany
                [5] 5Department of Pediatric Kidney, Liver and Metabolic Diseases, Hannover Medical School , Hanover, Germany
                [6] 6Department of Pediatrics II, University Hospital of Essen , Essen, Germany
                Author notes

                Edited by: Vera Hermina Koch, University of São Paulo, Brazil

                Reviewed by: Gema Ariceta, Vall d’Hebron University Hospital, Spain; Etienne Merlin, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Clermont-Ferrand, France

                *Correspondence: Julia Thumfart, Julia.thumfart@ 123456charite.de

                This article was submitted to Pediatric Nephrology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Pediatrics

                Article
                10.3389/fped.2022.850819
                9039165
                35498796
                aef9bd9e-6e97-471a-bc3d-fb420e3f2745
                Copyright © 2022 Taylan, Schaaf, Dorn, Schmitt, Loos, Kanzelmeyer, Pape, Müller, Weber and Thumfart.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 08 January 2022
                : 14 March 2022
                Page count
                Figures: 1, Tables: 6, Equations: 0, References: 18, Pages: 7, Words: 4419
                Categories
                Pediatrics
                Original Research

                register,pediatric,plasma exchange (pe),immunoadsorption (ia),complications

                Comments

                Comment on this article