12
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares

      Call for Papers: Green Renal Replacement Therapy: Caring for the Environment

      Submit here before September 30, 2024

      About Blood Purification: 3.0 Impact Factor I 5.6 CiteScore I 0.83 Scimago Journal & Country Rank (SJR)

      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found

      Standard Heparin versus Low-Molecular-Weight Heparin

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background: To compare standard heparin (SH) and low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) in terms of anticoagulation, platelet activation and lipid metabolism, we selected 54 patients who had been on 4-hour hemodialysis three times weekly for at least 12 months, without bleeding disorders or dyslipidemic diseases. 28 were on hemodialysis with Polysulfone low-flux, 26 were on hemodiafiltration with Polysulfone high-flux. All patients underwent EPO. Methods: During the first 18 months, we administered SH 1,500 IU on starting dialysis and 1,500 ± 500 IU in continuous intradialytic infusion per session. In the following 18 months, we administered LMWH 64.6 IU/kg on starting dialysis in a single arterious bolus. We assessed aPTT, anti-factor Xa activity, TAT and FPA, β-TG and PF4. Blood samples were taken monthly at times 0, 30, 60, 180 and 240 min, as well as 1, 4 and 20 h after dialysis end. Predialysis cholesterol, HDL, LDL, triglycerides and lipoprotein(a) were checked monthly. Results: During both LMWH and SH sessions no clotting or major bleeding complications were observed. APTT with LMWH was lower than that found with SH (p < 0.001); aFXa using LMWH was higher than when using SH (p < 0.001); TAT and FPA were lower in LMWH sessions (p < 0.01) than in SH sessions. We also detected lower β-TG (p < 0.05) and PF4 levels (p < 0.05) using LMWH than using SH. As regards lipids, we only observed a significant decrease in triglycerides after 18 months of LMWH treatment. Conclusions: Routine use of LMWH during hemodialysis affords a safe and effective alternative to SH, and causes reduced platelet activation.

          Related collections

          Most cited references1

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found

          Low Molecular Weight Heparin in Hemodialysis Patients with a Bleeding Tendency

          Efficacy and safety of a low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) were studied in 33 stable maintenance hemodialysis patients who had a bleeding tendency on unfractionated heparin. The optimal dose of LMWH for each patient was titrated before the study; the mean total LMWH dosage was 1,152 ± 574 IU. No major bleeding or clot formation was noted in a total of 2,470 hemodialysis sessions during 6 months of LMWH administration. The mean value of plasma anti-factor Xa (anti-Xa) activity increased from 0.05 ± 0.03 IU/ml before dialysis to 0.34 ± 0.28 IU/ml after 2 h of dialysis and returned to 0.15 ± 0.09 IU/ml after 4 h of dialysis; the mean activated partial thromboplastin time was 26.1 ± 4.4 s before dialysis, 30.7 ± 9.5 s (an 18% increase) after 2 h of dialysis, and 26.2 ± 4.4 s after 4 h of dialysis. No significant change in serum antithrombin levels was noted throughout the whole study period. We conclude that a low dosage of LMWH is safe and effective in hemodialysis patients who have a risk of bleeding with unfractionated heparin. Serum anti-Xa activity is better than activated partial thromboplastin time and antithrombin in assessing the optimal dose of LMWH. A plasma anti-Xa activity of 0.37 IU/ml after 2 h of hemodialysis may represent an optimal dosage of LMWH for most patients.
            Bookmark

            Author and article information

            Journal
            Nephron
            Nephron
            S. Karger AG
            1660-8151
            2235-3186
            September 1 2002
            2002
            September 26 2002
            : 92
            : 3
            : 589-600
            Article
            10.1159/000064086
            49daf7bd-6788-4347-b530-bc92a8edc543
            © 2002

            https://www.karger.com/Services/SiteLicenses

            https://www.karger.com/Services/SiteLicenses

            History

            Comments

            Comment on this article

            scite_

            Similar content1,603

            Cited by7

            Most referenced authors18