8
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Association of Smoking Status With Recurrence, Metastasis, and Mortality Among Patients With Localized Prostate Cancer Undergoing Prostatectomy or Radiotherapy : A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Importance

          Studies investigating the association of cigarette smoking with prostate cancer incidence and outcomes have revealed controversial results.

          Objective

          To systematically review and analyze the association of smoking status with biochemical recurrence, metastasis, and cancer-specific mortality among patients with localized prostate cancer undergoing primary radical prostatectomy or radiotherapy.

          Data Sources

          A systematic search of original articles published between January 2000 and March 2017 was performed using PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases in March 2017.

          Study Selection

          Observational studies reporting Cox proportional hazards regression or logistic regression analyses were independently screened.

          Data Extraction and Synthesis

          This systematic review and meta-analysis was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement and the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Available multivariable hazard ratios (HRs) and corresponding 95% CIs were included in quantitative analysis. A risk-of-bias assessment was completed for nonrandomized studies.

          Main Outcomes and Measures

          Prespecified outcomes of interest were biochemical recurrence, metastasis, and cancer-specific mortality.

          Results

          A total of 5157 reports were identified, of which 16 articles were selected for qualitative analysis and 11 articles were selected for quantitative analysis. All included studies were observational and nonrandomized and comprised a total of 22 549 patients. Overall, 4202 patients (18.6%) were current smokers. The overall median follow-up was 72 months. Current smokers had a statistically significantly higher risk of biochemical recurrence (HR, 1.40; 95% CI, 1.18-1.66; P < .001 [10 studies]), as did former smokers (HR, 1.19; 95% CI, 1.09-1.30; P < .001 [7 studies]). Current smokers were also at a higher risk of metastasis (HR, 2.51; 95% CI, 1.80-3.51; P < .001 [3 studies]) and cancer-specific mortality (HR, 1.89; 95% CI, 1.37-2.60; P < .001 [5 studies]), whereas former smokers were not (metastasis: HR, 1.61; 95% CI, 0.65-3.97; P = .31 [2 studies]; cancer-specific mortality: HR, 1.05; 95% CI, 0.81-1.37; P = .70 [4 studies]).

          Conclusions and Relevance

          Current smokers at the time of primary curative treatment for localized prostate cancer are at higher risk of experiencing biochemical recurrence, metastasis, and cancer-specific mortality.

          Abstract

          This systematic review and meta-analysis examines the association of smoking status with biochemical recurrence, metastasis, and cancer-specific mortality among patients with localized prostate cancer undergoing primary radical prostatectomy or radiotherapy.

          Key Points

          Question

          What is the association of smoking with oncologic outcomes among patients undergoing radical prostatectomy or radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer?

          Findings

          In this systematic review and meta-analysis that included 11 studies with 22 549 patients with prostate cancer undergoing primary radical prostatectomy or radiotherapy, current smokers had a significantly higher risk of biochemical recurrence, metastasis, and cancer-specific mortality.

          Meaning

          These results should encourage radiation oncologists and urologists to counsel patients on smoking cessation, given the risk of poorer oncologic outcomes associated with smoking.

          Related collections

          Most cited references28

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Defining biochemical failure following radiotherapy with or without hormonal therapy in men with clinically localized prostate cancer: recommendations of the RTOG-ASTRO Phoenix Consensus Conference.

          In 1996 the American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology (ASTRO) sponsored a Consensus Conference to establish a definition of biochemical failure after external beam radiotherapy (EBRT). The ASTRO definition defined prostate specific antigen (PSA) failure as occurring after three consecutive PSA rises after a nadir with the date of failure as the point halfway between the nadir date and the first rise or any rise great enough to provoke initiation of therapy. This definition was not linked to clinical progression or survival; it performed poorly in patients undergoing hormonal therapy (HT), and backdating biased the Kaplan-Meier estimates of event-free survival. A second Consensus Conference was sponsored by ASTRO and the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group in Phoenix, Arizona, on January 21, 2005, to revise the ASTRO definition. The panel recommended: (1) a rise by 2 ng/mL or more above the nadir PSA be considered the standard definition for biochemical failure after EBRT with or without HT; (2) the date of failure be determined "at call" (not backdated). They recommended that investigators be allowed to use the ASTRO Consensus Definition after EBRT alone (no hormonal therapy) with strict adherence to guidelines as to "adequate follow-up." To avoid the artifacts resulting from short follow-up, the reported date of control should be listed as 2 years short of the median follow-up. For example, if the median follow-up is 5 years, control rates at 3 years should be cited. Retaining a strict version of the ASTRO definition would allow comparisons with a large existing body of literature.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            The role of starches in etiology of gastric cancer

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Smoking as a risk factor for prostate cancer: a meta-analysis of 24 prospective cohort studies.

              We evaluated the relationship between smoking and adenocarcinoma of the prostate. We pooled data from 24 cohort studies enrolling 21 579 prostate cancer case participants for a general variance-based meta-analysis. Summary relative risks (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated separately for mortality and incidence studies. We tested the robustness of effect measures and evaluated statistical heterogeneity with sensitivity analyses. In the pooled data, current smokers had no increased risk of incident prostate cancer (RR = 1.04; 95% CI = 0.87, 1.24), but in data stratified by amount smoked they had statistically significant elevated risk (cigarettes per day or years: RR = 1.22; 95% CI = 1.01, 1.46; pack years of smoking: RR = 1.11; 95% CI = 1.01, 1.22). Former smokers had an increased risk (RR = 1.09; 95% CI = 1.02, 1.16). Current smokers had an increased risk of fatal prostate cancer (RR = 1.14; 95% CI = 1.06, 1.19). The heaviest smokers had a 24% to 30% greater risk of death from prostate cancer than did nonsmokers. Observational cohort studies show an association of smoking with prostate cancer incidence and mortality. Ill-defined exposure categories in many cohort studies suggest that pooled data underestimate risk.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                JAMA Oncol
                JAMA Oncol
                JAMA Oncol
                JAMA Oncology
                American Medical Association
                2374-2437
                2374-2445
                24 May 2018
                July 2018
                24 May 2019
                : 4
                : 7
                : 953-961
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
                [2 ]Department of Urology, Kantonsspital Winterthur, Winterthur, Switzerland
                [3 ]Department of Urology, Hospital Universitario Fundación Alcorcón, Madrid, Spain
                [4 ]Division of Urology, Department of Special Surgery, Jordan University Hospital, The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan
                [5 ]Department of Urology, Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
                [6 ]Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York
                [7 ]Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas
                [8 ]Karl Landsteiner Institute of Urology and Andrology, Vienna, Austria
                Author notes
                Article Information
                Accepted for Publication: March 3, 2018.
                Corresponding Author: Shahrokh F. Shariat, MD, Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, WähringerGürtel 18-20, A-1090 Vienna, Austria ( sfshariat@ 123456gmail.com ).
                Published Online: May 24, 2018. doi:10.1001/jamaoncol.2018.1071
                Author Contributions: Dr Foerster had full access to all the data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis. Drs Foerster and Pozo are co-first authors.
                Study concept and design: Foerster, Pozo, Abufaraj, Shariat.
                Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data: All authors.
                Drafting of the manuscript: Foerster, Pozo, Abufaraj, Shariat.
                Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: All authors.
                Statistical analysis: Foerster, Pozo, Mari, Kimura, Shariat.
                Administrative, technical, or material support: Foerster, Abufaraj, Mari, D’Andrea, Shariat.
                Study supervision: Foerster, Abufaraj, D’Andrea, Shariat.
                Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Dr Shariat reported owning or co-owning the following patents: “Methods to determine prognosis after therapy for prostate cancer,” granted September 6, 2002; “Methods to determine prognosis after therapy for bladder cancer,” granted June 19, 2003; “Prognostic methods for patients with prostatic disease,” granted August 5, 2004; and “Soluble Fas: urinary marker for the detection of bladder transitional cell carcinoma,” granted July 20, 2010; serving as an advisory board member for Astellas, Cepheid, Ipsen, Jansen, Lilly, Olympus, Pfizer, Pierre Fabre, Sanofi, and Wolff; and serving as a speaker for Astellas, Ipsen, Jansen, Lilly, Olympus, Pfizer, Pierre Fabre, Sanochemia, Sanofi, and Wolff.
                Funding/Support: Dr Foerster is supported by the Scholarship Foundation of Swiss Urology.
                Role of the Funder/Sponsor: The funding source had no role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript; and decision to submit the manuscript for publication.
                Article
                PMC6145736 PMC6145736 6145736 coi180024
                10.1001/jamaoncol.2018.1071
                6145736
                29800115
                1e84f87d-255f-4200-b148-1a04630497a6
                Copyright 2018 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.
                History
                : 29 November 2017
                : 18 February 2018
                : 3 March 2018
                Funding
                Funded by: Scholarship Foundation of Swiss Urology
                Categories
                Research
                Research
                Original Investigation
                Featured
                Online First

                Comments

                Comment on this article