9
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Association of Prescription Drug Price Rebates in Medicare Part D With Patient Out-of-Pocket and Federal Spending

      research-article
      , PhD, , PhD, , MBA, MA, , MD, MAPP
      JAMA internal medicine

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The increasing cost of prescription drugs is a burden for patients and threatens the financial stability of the US health care system. Rebates are a form of price concession paid by a pharmaceutical manufacturer to the health plan sponsor or the pharmacy benefit manager working on the plan’s behalf. Proponents argue that rebates result from vigorous negotiations that help lower overall drug costs. Critics argue that rebates have perversely increased the costs patients pay out of pocket, as well as the costs for Medicare as a whole. This special communication discusses how the availability of rebates for drugs covered by the Medicare Part D program may raise costs for patients and Medicare while increasing the profits of Part D plan sponsors and pharmaceutical manufacturers. Two policy alternatives are herein proposed that would reconfigure cost sharing to lower patient out-of-pocket costs and reduce cost shifting to Medicare.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          101589534
          40864
          JAMA Intern Med
          JAMA Intern Med
          JAMA internal medicine
          2168-6106
          2168-6114
          2 December 2017
          01 August 2017
          08 December 2017
          : 177
          : 8
          : 1185-1188
          Affiliations
          Eshelman School of Pharmacy, Division of Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (Dusetzina); Gillings School of Global Public Health, Department of Health Policy and Management, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (Dusetzina); UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (Dusetzina); Cecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (Dusetzina); Department of Pediatrics, Section of Hematology/Oncology, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois (Conti); Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois (Conti); Biological Collegiate Division, The College, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois (Conti); University of Chicago Medicine Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chicago, Illinois (Conti); The Center for Health Administration Studies, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois (Conti); Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York (Yu, Bach)
          Author notes
          Corresponding Author: Stacie B. Dusetzina, PhD, Eshelman School of Pharmacy, Division of Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Kerr Hall, Room 2203, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 ( dusetzina@ 123456unc.edu )
          Article
          PMC5722464 PMC5722464 5722464 nihpa923297
          10.1001/jamainternmed.2017.1885
          5722464
          28558108
          7fc8f15e-a6d3-45e4-b602-2caea1694a80
          History
          Categories
          Article

          Comments

          Comment on this article