For Publishers
DiscoveryMetadataPeer reviewHostingPublishing
For Researchers
JoinPublishReviewCollect
Register
Blog
About
Search
Advanced search
My ScienceOpen
Search
For Publishers
For Researchers
Blog
About
Inviting an author to review:
The Role of the Adipokines in the Most Common Gestational Complications
Find an author and click ‘Invite to review selected article’ near their name.
Search for authorsSearch for similar articles
50
views
31
references
 Top references
cited by
147
    
0 reviews
 Review
0
comments
 Comment
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      75
      similar
       All similar
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Taxonomy of approaches to developing interventions to improve health: a systematic methods overview.

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Interventions need to be developed prior to the feasibility and piloting phase of a study. There are a variety of published approaches to developing interventions, programmes or innovations to improve health. Identifying different types of approach, and synthesising the range of actions taken within this endeavour, can inform future intervention development.

          Related collections

          Most cited references31

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          A Systematic Review of Co-Creation and Co-Production: Embarking on the social innovation journey

          W. Voorberg, V. Bekkers, L. G. Tummers (2014)
          Article 0 comments Cited 313 times – based on 0 reviews     Review now
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            From ideas to efficacy: The ORBIT model for developing behavioral treatments for chronic diseases.

            Susan Czajkowski, Lynda H. Powell, Nancy Adler … (2015)
            Given the critical role of behavior in preventing and treating chronic diseases, it is important to accelerate the development of behavioral treatments that can improve chronic disease prevention and outcomes. Findings from basic behavioral and social sciences research hold great promise for addressing behaviorally based clinical health problems, yet there is currently no established pathway for translating fundamental behavioral science discoveries into health-related treatments ready for Phase III efficacy testing. This article provides a systematic framework for developing behavioral treatments for preventing and treating chronic diseases.
            Article 0 comments Cited 262 times – based on 0 reviews     Review now
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              A systematic development process for patient decision aids

              Angela Coulter, Diana Stilwell, Jennifer Kryworuchko … (2013)
              Background The original version of the International Patient Decision Aid Standards (IPDAS) recommended that patient decision aids (PtDAs) should be carefully developed, user-tested and open to scrutiny, with a well-documented and systematically applied development process. We carried out a review to check the relevance and scope of this quality dimension and, if necessary, to update it. Methods Our review drew on three sources: a) published papers describing PtDAs evaluated in randomised controlled trials and included in the most recent Cochrane Collaboration review; b) linked papers cited in the trial reports that described how the PtDAs had been developed; and c) papers and web reports outlining the development process used by organisations experienced in developing multiple PtDAs. We then developed an extended model of the development process indicating the various steps on which documentation is required, as well as a checklist to assess the frequency with which each of the elements was publicly reported. Results Key features common to all patient decision aid (PtDA) development processes include: scoping and design; development of a prototype; ‘alpha’ testing with patients and clinicians in an iterative process; ‘beta’ testing in ‘real life’ conditions (field tests); and production of a final version for use and/or further evaluation. Only about half of the published reports on the development of PtDAs that we reviewed appear to have been field tested with patients, and even fewer had been reviewed or tested by clinicians not involved in the development process. Very few described a distribution strategy, and surprisingly few (17%) described a method for reviewing and synthesizing the clinical evidence. We describe a model development process that includes all the original elements of the original IPDAS criterion, expanded to include consideration of format and distribution plans as well as prototype development. Conclusions The case for including each of the elements outlined in our model development process is pragmatic rather than evidence-based. Optimal methods for ensuring that each stage of the process is carried out effectively require further development and testing.
              Article 0 comments Cited 215 times – based on 0 reviews     Review now
                Bookmark
                All references

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Journal ID (iso-abbrev): Pilot Feasibility Stud
                Title: Pilot and feasibility studies
                Publisher: Springer Science and Business Media LLC
                ISSN: 2055-5784
                ISSN (Print): 2055-5784
                Publication date (Electronic): 2019
                Volume: 5
                Affiliations
                [1 ] 1Medical Care Research Unit, Health Services Research, School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Regent Court, 30 Regent Street, Sheffield, S1 4DA UK.
                [2 ] 2NMAHP Research Unit, University of Stirling, Stirling, FK9 4NF UK.
                [3 ] Population Health Sciences, Canynge Hall, 39 Whatley Road, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8 2PS UK.
                Article
                Publisher Item ID: 425
                DOI: 10.1186/s40814-019-0425-6
                PMC ID: 6419435
                PubMed ID: 30923626
                SO-VID: da099b01-ee14-4132-8191-3c6b232e9a52
                History

                Keywords: Guidance,Health,Intervention development,Methodology,Review
                Data availability:
                Keywords: Guidance, Health, Intervention development, Methodology, Review

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_

                Similar content75

                See all similar

                Cited by139

                See all cited by

                Most referenced authors396

                See all reference authors