29
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Dual-chamber injection device for measles-rubella vaccine: The potential impact of introducing varying sizes of the devices in 3 countries

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Introduction

          By pairing diluent with vaccines, dual-chamber vaccine injection devices simplify the process of reconstituting vaccines before administration and thus decrease associated open vial wastage and adverse events. However, since these devices are larger than current vaccine vials for lyophilized vaccines, manufacturers need guidance as to how the size of these devices may affect vaccine distribution and delivery.

          Methods

          Using HERMES-generated immunization supply chain models of Benin, Bihar (India), and Mozambique, we replace the routine 10-dose measles-rubella (MR) lyophilized vaccine with single-dose MR dual-chamber injection devices, ranging the volume-per-dose (5.2–26 cm 3) and price-per-dose ($0.70, $1.40).

          Results

          At a volume-per-dose of 5.2 cm 3, a dual-chamber injection device results in similar vaccine availability, decreased open vial wastage (OVW), and similar total cost per dose administered as compared to baseline in moderately constrained supply chains. Between volumes of 7.5 cm 3 and 26 cm 3, these devices lead to a reduction in vaccine availability between 1% and 14% due to increases in cold chain storage utilization between 1% and 7% and increases in average peak transport utilization between 2% and 44%. At the highest volume-per-dose, 26 cm 3, vaccine availability decreases between 9% and 14%. The total costs per dose administered varied between each scenario, as decreases in vaccine procurement costs were coupled with decreases in doses administered. However, introduction of a dual-chamber injection device only resulted in improved total cost per dose administered for Benin and Mozambique (at 5.2 cm 3 and $0.70-per-dose) when the total number of doses administered changed <1% from baseline.

          Conclusion

          In 3 different country supply chains, a single-dose MR dual-chamber injection device would need to be no larger than 5.2 cm 3 to not significantly impair the flow of other vaccines.

          Related collections

          Most cited references19

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found
          Is Open Access

          Improving cold chain systems: Challenges and solutions

          While a number of new vaccines have been rolled out across the developing world (with more vaccines in the pipeline), cold chain systems are struggling to efficiently support national immunization programs in ensuring the availability of safe and potent vaccines. This article reflects on the Clinton Health Access Initiative, Inc. (CHAI) experience working since 2010 with national immunization programs and partners to improve vaccines cold chains in 10 countries-Ethiopia, Nigeria, Kenya, Malawi, Tanzania, Uganda, Cameroon, Mozambique, Lesotho and India - to identify the root causes and solutions for three common issues limiting cold chain performance. Key recommendations include: Collectively, the solutions detailed in this article chart a path to substantially improving the performance of the cold chain. Combined with an enabling global and in-country environment, it is possible to eliminate cold chain issues as a substantial barrier to effective and full immunization coverage over the next few years.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Literature review: The vaccine supply chain

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              A systems approach to obesity

              Obesity has become a truly global epidemic, affecting all age groups, all populations, and countries of all income levels. To date, existing policies and interventions have not reversed these trends, suggesting that innovative approaches are needed to transform obesity prevention and control. There are a number of indications that the obesity epidemic is a systems problem, as opposed to a simple problem with a linear cause-and-effect relationship. What may be needed to successfully address obesity is an approach that considers the entire system when making any important decision, observation, or change. A systems approach to obesity prevention and control has many benefits, including the potential to further understand indirect effects or to test policies virtually before implementing them in the real world. Discussed here are 5 key efforts to implement a systems approach for obesity prevention: 1) utilize more global approaches; 2) bring new experts from disciplines that do not traditionally work with obesity to share experiences and ideas with obesity experts; 3) utilize systems methods, such as systems mapping and modeling; 4) modify and combine traditional approaches to achieve a stronger systems orientation; and 5) bridge existing gaps between research, education, policy, and action. This article also provides an example of how a systems approach has been used to convene a multidisciplinary team and conduct systems mapping and modeling as part of an obesity prevention program in Baltimore, Maryland.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Vaccine
                Vaccine
                Vaccine
                Elsevier Science
                0264-410X
                1873-2518
                18 September 2018
                18 September 2018
                : 36
                : 39
                : 5879-5885
                Affiliations
                [a ]HERMES Logistics Modeling Team, Baltimore, MD and Pittsburgh, PA, USA
                [b ]Global Obesity Prevention Center (GOPC) at Johns Hopkins University, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA
                [c ]Pittsburgh Supercomputing Center, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
                [d ]McGill Centre for Integrative Neuroscience, McGill Neurological Institute, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
                Author notes
                [* ]Corresponding Author at: Department of International Health, Public Health Computational and Operations Research (PHICOR), International Vaccine Access Center (IVAC), Global Obesity Prevention Center (GOPC), Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, 615 N. Wolfe Street, Room W3501, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA. brucelee@ 123456jhu.edu
                Article
                S0264-410X(18)31135-6
                10.1016/j.vaccine.2018.08.026
                6143385
                30146404
                f9b4faa6-82bd-4ec1-ade1-dd31d987f4a7
                © 2018 The Authors

                This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

                History
                : 13 June 2018
                : 7 August 2018
                : 9 August 2018
                Categories
                Article

                Infectious disease & Microbiology
                dual-chamber injection device,measles,supply chain
                Infectious disease & Microbiology
                dual-chamber injection device, measles, supply chain

                Comments

                Comment on this article