95
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Lay Definitions of Happiness across Nations: The Primacy of Inner Harmony and Relational Connectedness

      Read this article at

          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          In well-being research the term happiness is often used as synonymous with life satisfaction. However, little is known about lay people's understanding of happiness. Building on the available literature, this study explored lay definitions of happiness across nations and cultural dimensions, analyzing their components and relationship with participants' demographic features. Participants were 2799 adults (age range = 30–60, 50% women) living in urban areas of Argentina, Brazil, Croatia, Hungary, India, Italy, Mexico, New Zealand, Norway, Portugal, South Africa, and United States. They completed the Eudaimonic and Hedonic Happiness Investigation (EHHI), reporting, among other information, their own definition of happiness. Answers comprised definitions referring to a broad range of life domains, covering both the contextual-social sphere and the psychological sphere. Across countries and with little variation by age and gender, inner harmony predominated among psychological definitions, and family and social relationships among contextual definitions. Whereas relationships are widely acknowledged as basic happiness components, inner harmony is substantially neglected. Nevertheless, its cross-national primacy, together with relations, is consistent with the view of an ontological interconnectedness characterizing living systems, shared by several conceptual frameworks across disciplines and cultures. At the methodological level, these findings suggest the potential of a bottom-up, mixed method approach to contextualize psychological dimensions within culture and lay understanding.

          Related collections

          Most cited references94

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          The meaning in life questionnaire: Assessing the presence of and search for meaning in life.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            An Overview of the Schwartz Theory of Basic Values

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Rethinking individualism and collectivism: evaluation of theoretical assumptions and meta-analyses.

              Are Americans more individualistic and less collectivistic than members of other groups? The authors summarize plausible psychological implications of individualism-collectivism (IND-COL), meta-analyze cross-national and within-United States IND-COL differences, and review evidence for effects of IND-COL on self-concept, well-being, cognition, and relationality. European Americans were found to be both more individualistic-valuing personal independence more-and less collectivistic-feeling duty to in-groups less-than others. However, European Americans were not more individualistic than African Americans, or Latinos, and not less collectivistic than Japanese or Koreans. Among Asians, only Chinese showed large effects, being both less individualistic and more collectivistic. Moderate IND-COL effects were found on self-concept and relationality, and large effects were found on attribution and cognitive style.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Frontiers in Psychology
                Front. Psychol.
                Frontiers Media SA
                1664-1078
                January 26 2016
                January 26 2016
                : 7
                Article
                10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00030
                3a45c976-a68c-4eef-9bf1-0e71875863a8
                © 2016
                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article