31
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Differential effects of dietary caloric and protein restriction in the aging rat

      , ,
      Experimental Gerontology
      Elsevier BV

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Numerous studies have shown caloric restriction retards the physiological decline and increases the life span of animals. However, in these studies protein consumption was also reduced; thus, whether the beneficial effects were due to caloric or to protein restriction is unclear. To examine independently the effects of caloric and protein restriction on growth, renal function, and survival, caloric restricted male rats were fed 18, 30 or 42 percent casein diets that provided two-thirds of the quantity of diet consumed by groups fed 12, 20, or 28 percent casein diets ad libitum, respectively. Hence, caloric restricted groups consumed the same amount of protein as their paired ad libitum fed groups but one-third fewer calories. The results showed that caloric restriction decreased mature body weight, increased the rate of attaining mature body weight, retarded the age-associated decline in renal function, and increased survival. Protein restriction had no effect on mature body weight, decreased maturation rate, improved renal function, and decreased survival. Thus, protein restriction did not contribute to the survival-promoting effects of caloric restriction in rats.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          Experimental Gerontology
          Experimental Gerontology
          Elsevier BV
          05315565
          January 1983
          January 1983
          : 18
          : 6
          : 427-435
          Article
          10.1016/0531-5565(83)90021-9
          a55a1af8-a5ad-43b7-842f-1e3dca811367
          © 1983

          https://www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/

          History

          Comments

          Comment on this article