39
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Three new Jurassic euharamiyidan species reinforce early divergence of mammals.

      Nature
      Animals, China, Fossils, Mammals, anatomy & histology, classification, Mandible, Phylogeny, Skeleton, Skull, Tooth

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The phylogeny of Allotheria, including Multituberculata and Haramiyida, remains unsolved and has generated contentious views on the origin and earliest evolution of mammals. Here we report three new species of a new clade, Euharamiyida, based on six well-preserved fossils from the Jurassic period of China. These fossils reveal many craniodental and postcranial features of euharamiyidans and clarify several ambiguous structures that are currently the topic of debate. Our phylogenetic analyses recognize Euharamiyida as the sister group of Multituberculata, and place Allotheria within the Mammalia. The phylogeny suggests that allotherian mammals evolved from a Late Triassic (approximately 208 million years ago) Haramiyavia-like ancestor and diversified into euharamiyidans and multituberculates with a cosmopolitan distribution, implying homologous acquisition of many craniodental and postcranial features in the two groups. Our findings also favour a Late Triassic origin of mammals in Laurasia and two independent detachment events of the middle ear bones during mammalian evolution.

          Related collections

          Most cited references28

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The earliest known eutherian mammal.

          The skeleton of a eutherian (placental) mammal has been discovered from the Lower Cretaceous Yixian Formation of northeastern China. We estimate its age to be about 125 million years (Myr), extending the date of the oldest eutherian records with skull and skeleton by about 40 50 Myr. Our analyses place the new fossil at the root of the eutherian tree and among the four other known Early Cretaceous eutherians, and suggest an earlier and greater diversification of stem eutherians that occurred well before the molecular estimate for the diversification of extant placental superorders (104 64 Myr). The new eutherian has limb and foot features that are known only from scansorial (climbing) and arboreal (tree-living) extant mammals, in contrast to the terrestrial or cursorial (running) features of other Cretaceous eutherians. This suggests that the earliest eutherian lineages developed different locomotory adaptations, facilitating their spread to diverse niches in the Cretaceous.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            An Early Cretaceous tribosphenic mammal and metatherian evolution.

            Derived features of a new boreosphenidan mammal from the Lower Cretaceous Yixian Formation of China suggest that it has a closer relationship to metatherians (including extant marsupials) than to eutherians (including extant placentals). This fossil dates to 125 million years ago and extends the record of marsupial relatives with skeletal remains by 50 million years. It also has many foot structures known only from climbing and tree-living extant mammals, suggesting that early crown therians exploited diverse niches. New data from this fossil support the view that Asia was likely the center for the diversification of the earliest metatherians and eutherians during the Early Cretaceous.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Evolution of the vertebral formulae in mammals: a perspective on developmental constraints.

              Developmental constraints refer to biases that limit phenotypic changes during evolution. To examine the contribution of developmental constraints in the evolution of vertebrate morphology, we analyzed the distribution pattern of mammalian vertebral formulae. Data on mammalian vertebral formulae were collected from the Descriptive Catalogue of the Osteological Series Contained in the Museum of the Royal College of Surgeons of England by Richard Owen (1853) and were plotted onto the most reliable mammalian phylogenetic tree based on recent molecular studies. In addition to the number of cervical vertebrae that is almost fixed to 7, we found that the number of thoracolumbar vertebrae tends to be 19 in many groups of mammals. Since fidelity of the number of thoracolumbar vertebrae was also completely maintained in Monotremata and Marsupialia, we presumed that thoracolumbar vertebral number as well as cervical vertebral number might have been fixed in the primitive mammalian lineage. On the basis of primitive vertebral formulae, we could clarify the polarity of evolution and identify several deviations from the primitive states during the mammalian evolution. The changes in the vertebral formulae in eutherian mammals seem to be lineage-specific, such that most species in Carnivora have 20 instead of 19 thoracolumbar vertebrae. Because such lineage-specific vertebral formulae contrast with the estimated distribution pattern on the assumption of evolution only through the selective pressure, we concluded that developmental constraints played an important role in the evolution of mammalian vertebral formulae. Copyright 2005 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                25209669
                10.1038/nature13718

                Chemistry
                Animals,China,Fossils,Mammals,anatomy & histology,classification,Mandible,Phylogeny,Skeleton,Skull,Tooth
                Chemistry
                Animals, China, Fossils, Mammals, anatomy & histology, classification, Mandible, Phylogeny, Skeleton, Skull, Tooth

                Comments

                Comment on this article