62
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Computational approaches to fMRI analysis

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Analysis methods in cognitive neuroscience have not always matched the richness of fMRI data. Early methods focused on estimating neural activity within individual voxels or regions, averaged over trials or blocks and modeled separately in each participant. This approach mostly neglected the distributed nature of neural representations over voxels, the continuous dynamics of neural activity during tasks, the statistical benefits of performing joint inference over multiple participants and the value of using predictive models to constrain analysis. Several recent exploratory and theory-driven methods have begun to pursue these opportunities. These methods highlight the importance of computational techniques in fMRI analysis, especially machine learning, algorithmic optimization and parallel computing. Adoption of these techniques is enabling a new generation of experiments and analyses that could transform our understanding of some of the most complex—and distinctly human—signals in the brain: acts of cognition such as thoughts, intentions and memories.

          Related collections

          Most cited references67

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Distributed and overlapping representations of faces and objects in ventral temporal cortex.

          The functional architecture of the object vision pathway in the human brain was investigated using functional magnetic resonance imaging to measure patterns of response in ventral temporal cortex while subjects viewed faces, cats, five categories of man-made objects, and nonsense pictures. A distinct pattern of response was found for each stimulus category. The distinctiveness of the response to a given category was not due simply to the regions that responded maximally to that category, because the category being viewed also could be identified on the basis of the pattern of response when those regions were excluded from the analysis. Patterns of response that discriminated among all categories were found even within cortical regions that responded maximally to only one category. These results indicate that the representations of faces and objects in ventral temporal cortex are widely distributed and overlapping.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Multi-task connectivity reveals flexible hubs for adaptive task control

            Extensive evidence suggests the human ability to adaptively implement a wide variety of tasks is preferentially due to the operation of a fronto-parietal brain network. We hypothesized that this network’s adaptability is made possible by ‘flexible hubs’ – brain regions that rapidly update their pattern of global functional connectivity according to task demands. We utilized recent advances in characterizing brain network organization and dynamics to identify mechanisms consistent with the flexible hub theory. We found that the fronto-parietal network’s brain-wide functional connectivity pattern shifted more than other networks’ across a variety of task states, and that these connectivity patterns could be used to identify the current task. Further, these patterns were consistent across practiced and novel tasks, suggesting reuse of flexible hub connectivity patterns facilitates adaptive (novel) task performance. Together, these findings support a central role for fronto-parietal flexible hubs in cognitive control and adaptive implementation of task demands generally.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              The neural basis of loss aversion in decision-making under risk.

              People typically exhibit greater sensitivity to losses than to equivalent gains when making decisions. We investigated neural correlates of loss aversion while individuals decided whether to accept or reject gambles that offered a 50/50 chance of gaining or losing money. A broad set of areas (including midbrain dopaminergic regions and their targets) showed increasing activity as potential gains increased. Potential losses were represented by decreasing activity in several of these same gain-sensitive areas. Finally, individual differences in behavioral loss aversion were predicted by a measure of neural loss aversion in several regions, including the ventral striatum and prefrontal cortex.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                9809671
                21092
                Nat Neurosci
                Nat. Neurosci.
                Nature neuroscience
                1097-6256
                1546-1726
                8 April 2017
                23 February 2017
                23 August 2017
                : 20
                : 3
                : 304-313
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey, USA
                [2 ]Department of Psychology, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey, USA
                [3 ]Department of Computer Science, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey, USA
                [4 ]Department of Electrical Engineering, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey, USA
                [5 ]Intel Labs, Intel Corporation, Santa Clara, California, USA
                Author notes
                Correspondence should be addressed to N.B.T.-B. ( ntb@ 123456princeton.edu )
                Article
                PMC5457304 PMC5457304 5457304 nihpa863150
                10.1038/nn.4499
                5457304
                28230848
                04b7f02d-35c3-4d5f-a60a-df76dac2e514

                Reprints and permissions information is available online at http://www.nature.com/reprints/index.html.

                History
                Categories
                Article

                Comments

                Comment on this article