43
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Cosmological solutions to the Lithium problem: Big-bang nucleosynthesis with photon cooling, \(X\)-particle decay and a primordial magnetic field

      Preprint

      Read this article at

          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The \(^7\)Li abundance calculated in BBN with the baryon-to-photon ratio fixed from fits to the CMB power spectrum is inconsistent with the observed lithium abundances on the surface of metal-poor halo stars. Previous cosmological solutions proposed to resolve this \(^7\)Li problem include photon cooling (possibly via the Bose-Einstein condensation of a scalar particle) or the decay of a long-lived \(X-\)particle (possibly the next-to-lightest supersymmetric particle). In this paper we reanalyze these solutions, both separately and in concert. We also introduce the possibility of a primordial magnetic field (PMF) into these models. We constrain the \(X-\)particles and the PMF parameters by the observed light element abundances using a likelihood analysis to show that the inclusion of all three possibilities leads to an optimum solution to the lithium problem. We deduce allowed ranges for the \(X-\)particle parameters and energy density in the PMF that can solve \(^7\)Li problem.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          30 June 2014
          Article
          10.1103/PhysRevD.90.023001
          1407.0021
          7c824e5a-983b-4bf5-94c6-f3184b09198d

          http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/

          History
          Custom metadata
          Phys. Rev. D 90, 023001 (2014)
          11 pages, 3 figures. Accepted 4 June 2014 publication in Physical Review D
          astro-ph.CO hep-ph

          Comments

          Comment on this article