13
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares

      Authors - did you know Parasite has been awarded the DOAJ Seal for “best practice in open access publishing”?

      • 3.020 2021 Impact Factor
      • Rapid publication and moderate publication fee
      • Creative Commons license
      • Long articles welcome – no page limits

      Instructions for authors, online submissions and free e-mail alerts all available at parasite-journal.org

      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Some quantitative aspects of natural babesial infection in the haemolymph ofBoophilus microplusengorged female ticks

      , , ,
      Parasite
      EDP Sciences

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Quantitative aspects of the natural babesial (Babesia bovis and Babesia bigemina) infection in Boophilus microplus engorged female ticks obtained from two herds of Holstein heifers positive by the immunofluorescent antibody test to both protozoan were evaluated. The number of kinetes/microscope field of haemolymph was determined for each tick from day 5 to 10 post-collection. A close relationship between daily and cumulative babesial infection was detected. Correlation and determination coefficients between days post-collection and the daily and cumulative infection rates, including heavily infected ticks (those ticks carrying at least 3.0 kinetes/microscope field of haemolymph), were always higher than 0.9 (P < 0.01) in ticks of both herds. The median was found to be a more representative measure than the mean to define the distribution of kinetes number amongst infected ticks since this is a negative binomial distribution. The analysis of the sequential order of days of infection more accurately showed the amplification of the babesial infection in the tick haemolymph than the evolution of kinetes number in relation to days post-collection. Sampling ticks on days 8, 9 and 10 post-collection would have detected all ticks infected with Babesia spp. from both herds. A categorization of infected or non infected ticks would be of greater epidemiological importance than the haemolymph infection level, based upon previous laboratory studies that showed a poor relationship between haemolymph infection in the female ticks and the infection rate in their eggs. However, further studies in natural infected ticks and better techniques to differentiate B. bovis and B. bigemina kinetes are needed before these laboratory results can be applied to field conditions.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          Parasite
          Parasite
          EDP Sciences
          1252-607X
          1776-1042
          December 1997
          September 2014
          : 4
          : 4
          : 337-341
          Article
          10.1051/parasite/1997044337
          380817e1-b162-4601-b658-5e3dbbdf71bb
          © 1997

          This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

          History

          Parasitology,Life sciences
          Parasitology, Life sciences

          Comments

          Comment on this article