Legislation on biofuels production in the USA and Europe is directing food crops towards
the production of grain-based ethanol, which can have detrimental consequences for
soil carbon sequestration, nitrous oxide emissions, nitrate pollution, biodiversity
and human health. An alternative is to grow lignocellulosic (cellulosic) crops on
'marginal' lands. Cellulosic feedstocks can have positive environmental outcomes and
could make up a substantial proportion of future energy portfolios. However, the availability
of marginal lands for cellulosic feedstock production, and the resulting greenhouse
gas (GHG) emissions, remains uncertain. Here we evaluate the potential for marginal
lands in ten Midwestern US states to produce sizeable amounts of biomass and concurrently
mitigate GHG emissions. In a comparative assessment of six alternative cropping systems
over 20 years, we found that successional herbaceous vegetation, once well established,
has a direct GHG emissions mitigation capacity that rivals that of purpose-grown crops
(-851 ± 46 grams of CO(2) equivalent emissions per square metre per year (gCO(2)e m(-2) yr(-1))).
If fertilized, these communities have the capacity to produce about 63 ± 5 gigajoules
of ethanol energy per hectare per year. By contrast, an adjacent, no-till corn-soybean-wheat
rotation produces on average 41 ± 1 gigajoules of biofuel energy per hectare per year
and has a net direct mitigation capacity of -397 ± 32 gCO(2)e m(-2) yr(-1); a continuous
corn rotation would probably produce about 62 ± 7 gigajoules of biofuel energy per
hectare per year, with 13% less mitigation. We also perform quantitative modelling
of successional vegetation on marginal lands in the region at a resolution of 0.4
hectares, constrained by the requirement that each modelled location be within 80
kilometres of a potential biorefinery. Our results suggest that such vegetation could
produce about 21 gigalitres of ethanol per year from around 11 million hectares, or
approximately 25 per cent of the 2022 target for cellulosic biofuel mandated by the
US Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007, with no initial carbon debt nor the
indirect land-use costs associated with food-based biofuels. Other regional-scale
aspects of biofuel sustainability, such as water quality and biodiversity, await future
study.