There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.
Abstract
Dear Sir
We would like to congratulate Dr. Singer with his excellent results using closed reduction
and cast immobilization under general anesthesia for displaced forearm fractures in
children.
These exceptional results are, however, not representative of treatment for displaced
forearm fractures in children in daily practice. As Dr. Singer himself states in his
Letter to the Editor, our results showing that 43.7 % of the children with a dislocated
forearm fracture treated with reduction without internal fixation needed a secondary
procedure under general anesthesia, are in concordance with those presented in previous
publications.
In our patient group, not all patients with a displaced forearm fracture were reduced
under general anesthesia. The less displaced and potentially stable fracture patients
were often reduced under local anesthesia and therefore excluded from our study group.
The differences in results may therefore in part be due to patient selection.
In our discussion, we did emphasize the importance of a correctly molded cast, and
in fact, a well-molded cast with three-point fixation was the primary treatment aim
for all patients.
The published data, however, show the realistic results of our daily practice in a
retrospective analysis. These results suggest that a significant improvement can be
accomplished by minimal invasive intramedullary fixation in case of fracture reduction
under general anesthesia. We strongly feel that this conclusion holds true for most
hospitals treating dislocated forearm fractures in children.
Leiden, April 24, 2012