41
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Psychoactive drug advertising: a comparison of technical information from three countries: Brazil, United States and United Kingdom.

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Studies carried out in the 1970s and 1980s showed that there were country-dependent disparities in the information given for the same drug in medical advertisements. National and international regulations have been published to do away with such disparities and to foster the rational use of drugs. The purpose of this study was to compare the information contained in psychoactive drug advertisements published in psychiatric journals in Brazil, the United States and the United Kingdom, before and subsequent to the publication of the United States Export Act, in 1986, the WHO criteria, in 1988, and the Brazilian Sanitary Surveillance Agency Resolution no. 102, in 2000. TYPE OF STUDY AND SETTING: Content analysis, at Centro Brasileiro de Informações sobre Drogas Psicotrópicas (Cebrid).

          Related collections

          Most cited references36

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Book: not found

          O desafio do conhecimento: pesquisa qualitativa em saúde

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Book: not found

            Análise de conteúdo

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Promoting rational prescribing: an international perspective.

              Irrational prescribing is a global problem. Rational prescribing cannot be defined without a method of measurement and a reference standard. The former is now available but the latter needs further development. Proven effective interventions to promote rational prescribing in developed countries are treatment protocols based on wide consultation and consensus, properly introduced and with a possibility of feedback; face-to-face education focussed on a particular prescribing problem in selected individuals; structured order forms; and focussed educational campaigns. Essential drugs lists are probably effective when based on consensus and used within a comprehensive educational programme. Printed materials alone are not effective. In most cases the usefulness of such strategies in developing countries has not been proven and should be studied. Medical education in clinical pharmacology and pharmacotherapy should be based on the practical needs of future prescribes, should include the principles of rational therapeutics and problem solving, and should immunize the students against the influences they are likely to encounter in their professional life, such as patient pressure, drug promotion and irrational prescribing by peers. Within the scope of a national formulary, specialist departments in teaching hospitals should define prescribing policies as the basis for prescribing, teaching, examinations and medical audit.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Sao Paulo Med J
                Sao Paulo medical journal = Revista paulista de medicina
                FapUNIFESP (SciELO)
                1516-3180
                1516-3180
                Sep 01 2005
                : 123
                : 5
                Affiliations
                [1 ] Centro Brasileiro de Informações sobre Drogas Psicotrópicas, Department of Psychobiology, Escola Paulista de Medicina, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
                Article
                S1516-31802005000500002
                10.1590/s1516-31802005000500002
                16358094
                97dc8a5a-5a62-4b9e-94ed-0355391a221f
                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article