57
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found

      Optimization and characterization of deoxypodophyllotoxin loaded mPEG-PDLLA micelles by central composite design with response surface methodology

      , , , , ,
      Chinese Journal of Natural Medicines
      Elsevier BV

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The therapeutic application of deoxypodophyllotoxin (DPT) is limited due to its poor water solubility and stability. In the present study, the micelles assembled by the amphiphilic block copolymers (mPEG-PDLLA) were constructed to improve the solubility and safety of DPT for their in vitro and in vivo application. The central composite design was utilized to develop the optimal formulation composed of 1221.41 mg mPEG-PDLLA, the weight ratio of 1 : 4 (mPEG-PDLLA : DPT), 30 mL hydration volume and the hydration temperature at 40 °C. The results showed that the micelles exhibited uniformly spherical shape with the diameter of 20 nm. The drug-loading and entrapment efficiency of deoxypodophyllotoxin-polymeric micelles (DPT-PM) were about (20 � 2.84)% and (98 � 0.79)%, respectively, indicating that the mathematical models predicted well for the results. Compared to the free DPT, the cytotoxicity showed that blank micelles possessed great safety for Hela cells. In addition, the DPT loaded micelle formulation achieved stronger cytotoxicity at the concentration of 1 × 10 −7 mol·L −1 , which showed significant difference from free DPT ( P < 0.05). In conclusion, the micelles were highly promising nano-carriers for the anti-tumor therapy with DPT.

          Author and article information

          Journal
          Chinese Journal of Natural Medicines
          Chinese Journal of Natural Medicines
          Elsevier BV
          18755364
          June 2018
          June 2018
          : 16
          : 6
          : 471-480
          Article
          10.1016/S1875-5364(18)30081-5
          7de734fb-f872-48cb-a7a7-339a4fa5e495
          © 2018

          https://www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/

          History

          Comments

          Comment on this article