25
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      The Future of Earth Observation in Hydrology

      research-article

      Read this article at

          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          In just the past five years, the field of Earth observation has progressed beyond the offerings of conventional space agency based platforms to include a plethora of sensing opportunities afforded by CubeSats, Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), and smartphone technologies that are being embraced by both for-profit companies and individual researchers. Over the previous decades, space agency efforts have brought forth well-known and immensely useful satellites such as the Landsat series and the Gravity Research and Climate Experiment (GRACE) system, with costs typically on the order of one billion dollars per satellite and with concept-to-launch timelines on the order of two decades (for new missions). More recently, the proliferation of smartphones has helped to miniaturise sensors and energy requirements, facilitating advances in the use of CubeSats that can be launched by the dozens, while providing ultra-high (3–5 m) resolution sensing of the Earth on a daily basis. Start-up companies that did not exist five years ago now operate more satellites in orbit than any space agency, and at costs that are a mere fraction of the cost of traditional satellite missions. With these advances come new space-borne measurements, such as real-time high-definition video for tracking air pollution, storm-cell development, flood propagation, precipitation monitoring, or even for constructing digital surfaces using structure-from-motion techniques. Closer to the surface, measurements from small unmanned drones and tethered balloons have mapped snow depths, floods, and estimated evaporation at sub-meter resolutions, pushing back on spatio-temporal constraints and delivering new process insights. At ground level, precipitation has been measured using signal attenuation between antennae mounted on cell phone towers, while the proliferation of mobile devices has enabled citizen-scientists to catalogue photos of environmental conditions, estimate daily average temperatures from battery state, and sense other hydrologically important variables such as channel depths using commercially available wireless devices. Global internet access is being pursued via high altitude balloons, solar planes, and hundreds of planned satellite launches, providing a means to exploit the Internet of Things as an entirely new measurement domain. Such global access will enable real-time collection of data from billions of smartphones or from remote research platforms. This future will produce petabytes of data that can only be accessed via cloud storage and will require new analytical approaches to interpret. The extent to which today’s hydrologic models can usefully ingest such massive data volumes is unclear. Nor is it clear whether this deluge of data will be usefully exploited, either because the measurements are superfluous, inconsistent, not accurate enough, or simply because we lack the capacity to process and analyse them. What is apparent is that the tools and techniques afforded by this array of novel and game-changing sensing platforms present our community with a unique opportunity to develop new insights that advance fundamental aspects of the hydrological sciences. To accomplish this will require more than just an application of the technology: in some cases, it will demand a radical rethink on how we utilise and exploit these new observing systems to enhance our understanding of the Earth and its linked processes.

          Related collections

          Most cited references40

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          GRACE measurements of mass variability in the Earth system.

          Monthly gravity field estimates made by the twin Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) satellites have a geoid height accuracy of 2 to 3 millimeters at a spatial resolution as small as 400 kilometers. The annual cycle in the geoid variations, up to 10 millimeters in some regions, peaked predominantly in the spring and fall seasons. Geoid variations observed over South America that can be largely attributed to surface water and groundwater changes show a clear separation between the large Amazon watershed and the smaller watersheds to the north. Such observations will help hydrologists to connect processes at traditional length scales (tens of kilometers or less) to those at regional and global scales.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            New global observations of the terrestrial carbon cycle from GOSAT: Patterns of plant fluorescence with gross primary productivity

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              A review of global terrestrial evapotranspiration: Observation, modeling, climatology, and climatic variability

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                101717742
                47099
                Hydrol Earth Syst Sci
                Hydrol Earth Syst Sci
                Hydrology and earth system sciences
                1027-5606
                1607-7938
                20 August 2018
                28 July 2017
                2017
                17 September 2018
                : 21
                : 7
                : 3879-3914
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Water Desalination and Reuse Center, King Abdullah University of Science and Technology, Thuwal, Saudi Arabia
                [2 ]Hydrological Science Laboratory, Goddard Space Flight Center (GSFC), National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA), Greenbelt, Maryland, United States
                [3 ]Byrd Polar and Climate Research Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA
                [4 ]Laboratory of Hydrology and Water Management, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
                [5 ]Hydrology and Quantitative Water Management Group, Wageningen University, The Netherlands
                [6 ]Department of Geodesy and Geoinformation, Technische Universität Wien, Austria
                [7 ]Center for Water Resource Systems, Technische Universität Wien, Austria
                [8 ]School of Land and Food, University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS 7001, Australia
                [9 ]School of Natural Resources, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE 68583, USA
                [10 ]State Key Laboratory of Remote Sensing Science, Institute of Remote Sensing and Digital Earth, Chinese Academy of Sciences and Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China
                [11 ]Zachry Department of Civil Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843, United States
                [12 ]Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey, USA
                Article
                PMC6140349 PMC6140349 6140349 nasapa1503429
                10.5194/hess-21-3879-2017
                6140349
                30233123
                14e4fedb-d62b-477e-af28-ffc16586b83f
                History
                Categories
                Article

                Comments

                Comment on this article