21
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares

      Authors - did you know Parasite has been awarded the DOAJ Seal for “best practice in open access publishing”?

      • 3.020 2021 Impact Factor
      • Rapid publication and moderate publication fee
      • Creative Commons license
      • Long articles welcome – no page limits

      Instructions for authors, online submissions and free e-mail alerts all available at parasite-journal.org

      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found
      Is Open Access

      The subspecific taxonomy of Trypanosoma brucei.

      Parasite
      Animals, History, 19th Century, History, 20th Century, Humans, Trypanosoma brucei brucei, classification, genetics, Trypanosoma brucei gambiense, Trypanosoma brucei rhodesiense, Trypanosomiasis, African, history, parasitology

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPubMed
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Trypanosoma brucei was first seen by David Bruce in 1894, in the blood of a cow in South Africa, and named in his honour in 1899. Trypanosomes seen in the blood of an Englishman in The Gambia in 1901 were named T. gambiense in 1902. Finally, in 1909, trypanosomes from the blood of an Englishman in Zambia ("Rhodesia") were named T. rhodesiense. Since then there has been continuous debate about the interrelationships of these three "species". Studies of the molecular biology of these trypanosomes, mainly analyses of their isoenzymes and deoxyribonucleic acid, now appear to have shown that T. "rhodesiense" cannot be distinguished from T. brucei brucei by any valid and consistent criterion, while T. "gambiense" probably does constitute a valid subspecies of T. brucei. There is still doubt whether populations of T. brucei are predominantly clonal or sexual. While some form of genetic exchange undoubtedly can occur in this species, its nature and frequency are unknown and there is evidence that the population structure of T. brucei is essentially clonal.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Comments

          Comment on this article