22
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares

      Call for Papers: Green Renal Replacement Therapy: Caring for the Environment

      Submit here before July 31, 2024

      About Blood Purification: 3.0 Impact Factor I 5.6 CiteScore I 0.83 Scimago Journal & Country Rank (SJR)

      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found

      Long-Term On-Line Hemodiafiltration Reduces Predialysis Beta-2-Microglobulin Levels in Chronic Hemodialysis Patients

      , , , ,
      Blood Purification
      S. Karger AG

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background: Hemodiafiltration (HDF) is effective in delaying the surgical need for carpal tunnel syndrome in chronic hemodialysis patients, however, predialysis β<sub>2</sub>-microglobulin levels were not reduced in most short-term studies. The aim of this study was to assess the effect of long-term and differing frequencies of on-line HDF on serum β<sub>2</sub>-microglobulin levels in comparison to high-flux hemodialysis (HD). Methods: One hundred and twelve patients in the Chang Gung Memorial Hospital Dialysis Unit were divided into three groups to receive different frequencies of on-line HDF alternating with high-flux HD. Group 1 was treated once with HDF and twice with high-flux HD per week (n = 21). Group 2 was treated twice with HDF and once with high-flux HD per week (n = 33). Group 3 was treated with HDF three times per week (n = 58). Analysis was performed to compare the serum β<sub>2</sub>-microglobulin levels in these groups and to high-flux HD. Results: After receiving HDF for a mean of 7.9 months, group 3 patients had a reduced predialysis β<sub>2</sub>-microglobulin level (22.2 ±5.3 vs. 34.8 ±6.3 mg/l, p < 0.001), postdialysis β<sub>2</sub>-microglobulin level (6.3 ± 2.0 vs. 13.8 ± 6.8 mg/l, p < 0.001) and an increased β<sub>2</sub>-microglobulin reduction rate (76.1 ± 5.6 vs. 61.1 ± 13.3%, p = 0.03) when compared to high-flux HD. A significant improvement in URR (p = 0.0004), Kt/V (p = 0.0002) and TAC urea levels (p = 0.006) but not nPCR (p = 0.122) was found after patients had been treated with on-line HDF. The β<sub>2</sub>-microglobulin reduction rate was positively correlated with the overall volume of the replacement solution per session (p < 0.0001). Patients in group 3 had lower predialysis β<sub>2</sub>-microglobulin levels than those in group 1 and group 2 (22.2 ± 5.3 vs. 25.2 ± 7.2 vs. 26.0 ± 4.2 mg/l, p = 0.02). Furthermore, an inverse correlation was found between the predialysis β<sub>2</sub>-microglobulin level and the duration of HDF, if patients were treated for more than 12 months (p = 0.031). Conclusion: On-line HDF has an increased dialysis efficiency compared to high-flux dialysis. Long-term HDF further reduced predialysis β<sub>2</sub>-microglobulin levels, thus, it may provide an improved modality for renal replacement therapy.

          Related collections

          Most cited references1

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found

          Remarkable Removal of Beta-2-Microglobulin by On-Line Hemodiafiltration

          Eight chronic, anuric hemodialysis patients were randomly treated with a high-flux polysulphone dialyzer (F80), using 6 different modes: conventional bicarbonate hemodialysis (HD), hemodiafiltration (HDF) with a replacement solution at 40, 60, 80 or 100 ml/min in postdilution and 80 ml/min in predilution. The differences in β 2 -microglobulin (β2M) reduction ratio and clearance were evaluated statistically by analysis of variance (ANOVA). Both studies revealed no significant difference between HD and HDF40 in postdilution, but an increasing significant difference from HDF60 to HDF100 in postdilution and with HDF80 in predilution. The mean reduction ratio ranged from 49.7 (HD) to 72.7% (HDF 100 ml/min), showing an overall statistically significant difference (p = 0.0000). For the clearance, the range was between 63.8 (HD) and 116.8 ml/min (HDF 100 ml/min) (p = 0.0000). β2M in the effluent dialysate with HDF100 ml/min reached up to a mean of 258 mg/session. Concerning small molecules (BUN, creatinine and P), there was a statistically significant different clearance for creatinine and especially for P with HDF 100 ml/min. Conclusion: HDF with an on-line replacement solution at 100 ml/min and a high-flux and biocompatible polysulphone membrane represents a new tool for enhanced removal of β2M. Besides a significant increase in creatinine and especially in phosphorus clearance is noted.
            Bookmark

            Author and article information

            Journal
            Blood Purification
            Blood Purif
            S. Karger AG
            0253-5068
            1421-9735
            July 1 2001
            2001
            February 26 2001
            : 19
            : 3
            : 301-307
            Article
            10.1159/000046958
            bccdfb20-c833-46a4-baaf-e9f60b0ffede
            © 2001

            https://www.karger.com/Services/SiteLicenses

            https://www.karger.com/Services/SiteLicenses

            History

            Comments

            Comment on this article