454
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    26
    shares

      Authors - did you know Parasite has been awarded the DOAJ Seal for “best practice in open access publishing”?

      • 3.020 2021 Impact Factor
      • Rapid publication and moderate publication fee
      • Creative Commons license
      • Long articles welcome – no page limits

      Instructions for authors, online submissions and free e-mail alerts all available at parasite-journal.org

      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Diversity of trypanorhynch metacestodes in teleost fishes from coral reefs off eastern Australia and New Caledonia

      , , ,  
      Parasite
      EDP Sciences

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Trypanorhynch metacestodes were examined from teleosts from coral reefs in eastern Australia and from New Caledonia. From over 12,000 fishes examined, 33 named species of trypanorhynchs were recovered as well as three species of tentacularioids which are described but not named. Host-parasite and parasite-host lists are provided, including more than 100 new host records. Lacistorhynchoid and tentacularioid taxa predominated with fewer otobothrioid and gymnorhynchoids. Five species, Callitetrarhynchus gracilis, Floriceps minacanthus, Pseudotobothrium dipsacum, Pseudolacistorhynchus heroniensis and Ps. shipleyi, were particularly common and exhibited low host specificity. Limited data suggested a higher diversity of larval trypanorhynchs in larger piscivorous fish families. Several fish families surveyed extensively (Blenniidae, Chaetodontidae, Gobiidae, Kyphosidae and Scaridae) yielded no trypanorhynch larvae. The overall similarity between the fauna of the Great Barrier Reef and New Caledonia was 45%. Where available, information on the adult stages in elasmobranchs has been included.

          Related collections

          Most cited references12

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          The Diversity of Coral Reefs: What Are We Missing?

          Tropical reefs shelter one quarter to one third of all marine species but one third of the coral species that construct reefs are now at risk of extinction. Because traditional methods for assessing reef diversity are extremely time consuming, taxonomic expertise for many groups is lacking, and marine organisms are thought to be less vulnerable to extinction, most discussions of reef conservation focus on maintenance of ecosystem services rather than biodiversity loss. In this study involving the three major oceans with reef growth, we provide new biodiversity estimates based on quantitative sampling and DNA barcoding. We focus on crustaceans, which are the second most diverse group of marine metazoans. We show exceptionally high numbers of crustacean species associated with coral reefs relative to sampling effort (525 species from a combined, globally distributed sample area of 6.3 m2). The high prevalence of rare species (38% encountered only once), the low level of spatial overlap (81% found in only one locality) and the biogeographic patterns of diversity detected (Indo-West Pacific>Central Pacific>Caribbean) are consistent with results from traditional survey methods, making this approach a reliable and efficient method for assessing and monitoring biodiversity. The finding of such large numbers of species in a small total area suggests that coral reef diversity is seriously under-detected using traditional survey methods, and by implication, underestimated.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The terminology of larval cestodes or metacestodes.

            L. Chervy (2002)
            The terminology associated with the nomenclature of larval or metacestodes is reviewed as well as the various morphological and developmental characters used to define different types of larval cestodes. Based on a review of the literature, the key characters differentiating the types of larval cestodes are the presence of a primary lacuna and the invagination/retraction of the scolex. The presence of a cercomer and of a bladder-like enlargement of the larval cestode were considered to be useful secondary characteristics. Using these characters, six basic types of larval cestodes were identified: the procercoid, an alacunate form which cannot develop further until ingested by a second intermediate host; the plerocercus, an alacunate form with a retracted scolex; the plerocercoid, an alacunate form with an everted scolex; the merocercoid, an alacunate form with an invaginated scolex; the cysticercoid, a lacunate form with a retracted scolex; and the cysticercus, a lacunate form with an invaginated scolex. The diversity of larval types within the broad classifications of cysticercoid and cysticercus can be differentiated by the use of appropriate prefixes. Deficiencies in knowledge of specific types of larval cestodes are identified and further avenues of research are indicated.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Host specificity of adult versus larval cestodes of the elasmobranch tapeworm order Trypanorhyncha.

              Host specificity between the adult and final larval stages (plerocercus, plerocercoid, or merocercoid) of a diversity of trypanorhynch species was compared using the host specificity index (HS s). Index values were generated for a total of 63 species representing all five trypanorhynch superfamilies and 11 families. Host specificity of both adults and final larvae was found to be widely variable among species, ranging from very high (oioxenous) to very low (euryxenous) for both stages. However, in general, host specificity was highest for the adult stage in the definitive host (mean HS s=3.86) and lowest for the final larval stage in the second intermediate host (mean HS s=6.29). This difference was found to be significant using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Limited data available for procercoids in the first intermediate host suggest that this stage exhibits a degree of specificity intermediate between that of the former two stages (mean HS s=4.23). No taxonomic trend was seen. Species with a plerocercoid final larval stage (mean HS s=8.62) were significantly less host-specific than those with plerocerci or merocercoids (mean HS s=5.56). This result may reflect the use of paratenic hosts by species possessing the relatively more resilient plerocercoid as their final larval stage. These results provide an example of how HS s can be used to compare levels of host specificity, in this instance, among stages of polyxenous life cycles. They also emphasise the importance of articulating the life cycle stage under consideration when general statements are made about host specificity.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Parasite
                Parasite
                EDP Sciences
                1776-1042
                2014
                November 2014
                : 21
                :
                : 60
                Article
                10.1051/parasite/2014060
                0354b350-16a0-4fbd-a6a5-f910b5cbcb17
                © 2014

                This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

                History

                Parasitology,Life sciences
                Parasitology, Life sciences

                Comments

                Comment on this article