1,572
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    4
    shares

      Celebrating 65 years of The Computer Journal - free-to-read perspectives - bcs.org/tcj65

      scite_
       
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Conference Proceedings: found
      Is Open Access

      Co-designing Cards on Social Issues for Creating Educational Games

      proceedings-article
      , ,
      Proceedings of the 32nd International BCS Human Computer Interaction Conference (HCI)
      Human Computer Interaction Conference
      4 - 6 July 2018
      Educational game design, Design cards, Everyday Sexism, Participatory Design, Democratisation of Knowledge
      Bookmark

            Abstract

            This paper presents a participatory methodology to design cards on social issues with the purpose to democratise knowledge among co-designers on the learning content of educational games. Situated on the topic of everyday sexism, the methodology has been developed through an iterative process involving two collaborative workshops, two iterations of card design and a feedback survey. Extracting findings from the workshops and the feedback gathered on the co-designed cards, this paper presents insights that could be used to inform similar studies using cards to inspire and foster reflection on social issues.

            Content

            Author and article information

            Contributors
            Conference
            July 2018
            July 2018
            : 1-5
            Affiliations
            [0001]The Open University

            Milton Keynes, UK
            Article
            10.14236/ewic/HCI2018.164
            2af92d35-d7b7-4204-94ef-63dd9f174d47
            © Myers et al. Published by BCS Learning and Development Ltd. Proceedings of British HCI 2018. Belfast, UK.

            This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

            Proceedings of the 32nd International BCS Human Computer Interaction Conference
            HCI
            32
            Belfast, UK
            4 - 6 July 2018
            Electronic Workshops in Computing (eWiC)
            Human Computer Interaction Conference
            History
            Product

            1477-9358 BCS Learning & Development

            Self URI (article page): https://www.scienceopen.com/hosted-document?doi=10.14236/ewic/HCI2018.164
            Self URI (journal page): https://ewic.bcs.org/
            Categories
            Electronic Workshops in Computing

            Applied computer science,Computer science,Security & Cryptology,Graphics & Multimedia design,General computer science,Human-computer-interaction
            Educational game design,Participatory Design,Design cards,Democratisation of Knowledge,Everyday Sexism

            REFERENCES

            1. 2007 Game Object Model Version II: A Theoretical Framework for Educational Game Development Educ. Technol. Res. Dev 55 51 77

            2. , 2015 Mapping learning and game mechanics for serious games analysis Br. J. Educ. Technol 46 391 411

            3. 2009 The glass ceiling in the 21st century: Understanding barriers to gender equality

            4. 2011 Attention to Daily Encounters With Sexism as Way to Reduce Sexist Beliefs Psychol. Women Q 35 227 242

            5. 2015 An activity theory-based model for serious games analysis and conceptual design Comput. Educ 87 166 181

            6. 2016 From Abstract to Concrete: Telling Math Stories with Cards in: Proceedings of the 14th Participatory Design Conference: Short Papers, Interactive Exhibitions, Workshops - Volume 2, PDC ’16 ACM New York, NY, USA 90 91

            7. 2017 Using games to raise awareness: How to co-design serious mini-games? Comput. Educ 110 77 87

            8. 2014 Tango cards URL http://dl-acm-org.libezproxy.open.ac.uk/citation.cfm?doid=2598510.2598601

            9. 2016 Is Participatory Design Associated with the Effectiveness of Serious Digital Games for Healthy Lifestyle Promotion? A Meta-Analysis J. Med. Internet Res 18 e94

            10. 2010 Tiltfactor | Grow-A-Game URL http://www.tiltfactor.org/game/grow-a-game/

            11. 2011 Grow-A-Game: A Tool for Values Conscious Design and Analysis of Digital Games

            12. 2014 Reclaiming the Feminist Vision: Consciousness-Raising and Small Group Practice McFarland & Co, Jefferson North Carolina

            13. 2010 Ideation Decks: A Card-Based Design Ideation Tool

            14. 2006 Inspiration Card Workshops in: Proceedings of the 6th Conference on Designing Interactive Systems, DIS ’06 ACM New York, NY, USA 2 11

            15. 2012 Heritage: Having a say. Routledge Int. Handb. Particip. Des 21–36

            16. 2014 (Un)Structured Sources of Inspiration: Comparing the Effects of Game-like Cards and Design Cards on Creativity in Co-design Process in: Proceedings of the 13th Participatory Design Conference: Research Papers - Volume 1, PDC ’14 ACM New York, NY, USA 31 39

            17. 2013 The PLEX Cards and its techniques as sources of inspiration when designing for playfulness (PDF Download Available) URL http://www.researchgate.net/publication/264824212_The_PLEX_Cards_and_its_techniques_as_sources_of_inspiration_when_designing_for_playfulness

            18. 2017 Semantic Map of Sexism: Topic Modelling of Everyday Sexism Project Entries

            19. 2008 Dixit. BoardGameGeek URL http://boardgamegeek.com/boardgame/39856/dixit

            20. 1968 Consciousness-Raising: A Radical Weapon’

            21. 2012 Questionable Concepts: Critique As Resource for Designing with Eighty Somethings in: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI ’12 ACM New York, NY, USA 1169 1178

            22. 2016 Developing Ideation Cards for Mixed Reality Game Design

            23. 1996 Learning from experience through reflection. Organ. Dyn 24 36 48

            24. 2013 Reducing the Endorsement of Sexism Using Experiential Learning: The Workshop Activity for Gender Equity Simulation (WAGES) Psychol. Women Q 38 75 92

            Comments

            Comment on this article