43
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Multiparametric plasma EV profiling facilitates diagnosis of pancreatic malignancy.

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is usually detected late in the disease process. Clinical workup through imaging and tissue biopsies is often complex and expensive due to a paucity of reliable biomarkers. We used an advanced multiplexed plasmonic assay to analyze circulating tumor-derived extracellular vesicles (tEVs) in more than 100 clinical populations. Using EV-based protein marker profiling, we identified a signature of five markers (PDAC(EV) signature) for PDAC detection. In our prospective cohort, the accuracy for the PDAC(EV) signature was 84% [95% confidence interval (CI), 69 to 93%] but only 63 to 72% for single-marker screening. One of the best markers, GPC1 alone, had a sensitivity of 82% (CI, 60 to 95%) and a specificity of 52% (CI, 30 to 74%), whereas the PDAC(EV) signature showed a sensitivity of 86% (CI, 65 to 97%) and a specificity of 81% (CI, 58 to 95%). The PDAC(EV) signature of tEVs offered higher sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy than the existing serum marker (CA 19-9) or single-tEV marker analyses. This approach should improve the diagnosis of pancreatic cancer.

          Related collections

          Most cited references24

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Protein typing of circulating microvesicles allows real-time monitoring of glioblastoma therapy.

          Glioblastomas shed large quantities of small, membrane-bound microvesicles into the circulation. Although these hold promise as potential biomarkers of therapeutic response, their identification and quantification remain challenging. Here, we describe a highly sensitive and rapid analytical technique for profiling circulating microvesicles directly from blood samples of patients with glioblastoma. Microvesicles, introduced onto a dedicated microfluidic chip, are labeled with target-specific magnetic nanoparticles and detected by a miniaturized nuclear magnetic resonance system. Compared with current methods, this integrated system has a much higher detection sensitivity and can differentiate glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) microvesicles from nontumor host cell-derived microvesicles. We also show that circulating GBM microvesicles can be used to analyze primary tumor mutations and as a predictive metric of treatment-induced changes. This platform could provide both an early indicator of drug efficacy and a potential molecular stratifier for human clinical trials.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            SCS macrophages suppress melanoma by restricting tumor-derived vesicle-B cell interactions.

            Tumor-derived extracellular vesicles (tEVs) are important signals in tumor-host cell communication, yet it remains unclear how endogenously produced tEVs affect the host in different areas of the body. We combined imaging and genetic analysis to track melanoma-derived vesicles at organismal, cellular, and molecular scales to show that endogenous tEVs efficiently disseminate via lymphatics and preferentially bind subcapsular sinus (SCS) CD169(+) macrophages in tumor-draining lymph nodes (tdLNs) in mice and humans. The CD169(+) macrophage layer physically blocks tEV dissemination but is undermined during tumor progression and by therapeutic agents. A disrupted SCS macrophage barrier enables tEVs to enter the lymph node cortex, interact with B cells, and foster tumor-promoting humoral immunity. Thus, CD169(+) macrophages may act as tumor suppressors by containing tEV spread and ensuing cancer-enhancing immunity.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Tumor markers in pancreatic cancer: a European Group on Tumor Markers (EGTM) status report.

              Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma is one of the most difficult malignancies to diagnose and treat. The aim of this article is to review how tumor markers can aid the diagnosis and management of patients with this malignancy. The most widely used and best validated marker for pancreatic cancer is CA 19-9. Inadequate sensitivity and specificity limit the use of CA 19-9 in the early diagnosis of pancreatic cancer. In non-jaundiced patients, however, CA 19-9 may complement other diagnostic procedures. In patients with resectable pancreatic cancer, presurgical and postresection CA 19-9 levels correlate with overall survival. In advanced disease, elevated pretreatment levels of CA 19-9 are associated with adverse patient outcome and thus may be combined with other factors for risk stratification. Most, but not all, reports indicate that serial levels of CA 19-9 correlate with response to systemic therapy. Use of CA 19-9 kinetics in conjunction with imaging is therefore recommended in monitoring therapy. Although several potential serum and tissue markers for pancreatic cancer are currently undergoing evaluation, none are sufficiently validated for routine clinical use. CA 19-9 thus remains the serum pancreatic cancer marker against which new markers for this malignancy should be judged.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Sci Transl Med
                Science translational medicine
                American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
                1946-6242
                1946-6234
                May 24 2017
                : 9
                : 391
                Affiliations
                [1 ] Center for Systems Biology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114, USA.
                [2 ] Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114, USA.
                [3 ] Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114, USA.
                [4 ] Department of Biostatistics, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
                [5 ] Department of Population Medicine, Harvard Medical School and Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute, Boston, MA 02215, USA.
                [6 ] Department of Health Sciences, Northeastern University, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
                [7 ] Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, MA 02114, USA.
                [8 ] Center for Systems Biology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114, USA. rweissleder@mgh.harvard.edu.
                [9 ] Department of Systems Biology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
                Article
                9/391/eaal3226
                10.1126/scitranslmed.aal3226
                28539469
                a9276f9d-d9c6-46a2-9871-7e819233b795
                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article