6
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Association of Daily Dosage and Type of Statin Agent With Risk of Open-Angle Glaucoma

      research-article
      , MA, , PhD, MPH, , MD, MS
      JAMA ophthalmology

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          IMPORTANCE

          There is growing evidence that statins may protect against the development or worsening of open-angle glaucoma (OAG). As researchers plan clinical trials to more definitively study whether statins indeed protect against OAG, it would be helpful to know whether specific daily dosages or types of statin confer a greater protective effect than others.

          OBJECTIVE

          To assess whether the protective effect of statins on the risk of glaucoma varies depending on the daily dosage or type of statin taken.

          DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

          Using claims data from January 2001 to December 2009, we observed 25 420 patients with no preexisting glaucoma and quantified exposure to statins and other cholesterol-lowering medications. Using multivariable regression modeling, we assessed the hazard of developing OAG and how it varied by the daily dosage or type of statin and whether any protective effect persists after accounting for baseline low-density lipoprotein level.

          EXPOSURES

          Different daily dosages and types of statins.

          MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

          Hazard ratios (HRs) for developing OAG with 95% CIs.

          RESULTS

          Of the 25 420 patients who met the eligibility criteria for study inclusion, the mean (SD) age was 66.1 (5.8) years, and 14 112 (55.5%) were female. Additionally, 19 232 patients (84.1%) were white, 1252 (5.5%) were black, and 1558 (6.8%) were Latino. After accounting for baseline low-density lipoprotein levels, persons who filled prescriptions for statins continuously for 2 years had a 21% reduced risk of glaucoma compared with nonusers (adjusted HR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.66–0.96; P = .02). There was no additional protective effect associated with taking the highest dosage of statins (80 mg) compared with a lower dosage (40 mg) (HR, 1.03; 95% CI, 0.59–1.80; P = .91). The protective effect of the following statins on OAG risk did not differ compared with atorvastatin, an inexpensive generic statin: lovastatin (HR, 1.09; 95% CI, 0.71–1.68; P = .69), cerivastatin (HR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.09–4.41; P = .63), rosuvastatin (HR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.48–1.44; P = .51), fluvastatin (HR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.39–2.02; P = .78), pravastatin (HR, 1.29; 95% CI, 0.93–1.79; P = .13), and simvastatin (HR, 1.03; 95% CI, 0.83–1.29; P = .78).

          CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

          Even after accounting for baseline low-density lipoprotein level, statin exposure continued to be associated with a reduction in OAG risk. Our study helps inform researchers of a reasonable daily dosage and type of statin to use when designing randomized clinical trials to assess the association between statin use and glaucoma.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Contributors
          Journal
          101589539
          40866
          JAMA Ophthalmol
          JAMA Ophthalmol
          JAMA ophthalmology
          2168-6165
          2168-6173
          23 August 2018
          01 March 2017
          06 September 2018
          : 135
          : 3
          : 263-267
          Affiliations
          Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor
          Center for Eye Policy and Innovation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
          Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor
          Center for Eye Policy and Innovation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
          Department of Epidemiology, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor
          Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor
          Center for Eye Policy and Innovation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
          Department of Health Management and Policy, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor.
          Author notes

          Author Contributions: Dr Stein had full access to all the data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.

          Corresponding Author: Joshua D. Stein, MD, MS, Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Michigan, 1000 Wall St, Ann Arbor, MI 48105 ( jdstein@ 123456med.umich.edu ).
          Article
          PMC6126374 PMC6126374 6126374 nihpa985719
          10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2016.5406
          6126374
          28114645
          da290b83-23da-4989-bea4-140f8a270540
          History
          Categories
          Article

          Comments

          Comment on this article