43
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found

      The effect of atorvastatin treatment on lipid profile and adhesion molecule levels in hypercholesterolemic patients: relation to low-density lipoprotein receptor gene polymorphism.

      Radiology
      Adult, Aged, Anticholesteremic Agents, administration & dosage, Cholesterol, HDL, blood, Cholesterol, LDL, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Drug Administration Schedule, E-Selectin, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Gene Expression Regulation, Heptanoic Acids, Humans, Hypercholesterolemia, drug therapy, genetics, Inflammation Mediators, Intercellular Adhesion Molecule-1, Male, Middle Aged, Polymorphism, Genetic, Probability, Prospective Studies, Pyrroles, Receptors, LDL, metabolism, Reference Values, Severity of Illness Index, Treatment Outcome

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Inflammation has been indicated to play a major role in the development of atherosclerosis. The beneficial effect of statins has been suggested to be related to their anti-inflammatory properties. We have studied plasma levels of soluble adhesion molecules in patients with hypercholesterolemia before and after 3 months of treatment with atorvastatin and evaluated possible relations to the mutations in low-density lipoprotein receptor (LDLR) gene. In patients with no LDLR gene polymorphism (group A), lower baseline levels of total cholesterol and LDL cholesterol were found than in patients with LDLR gene polymorphism (group B). The soluble adhesion molecules sICAM-1, sE-selectin and sP-selectin, but not sVCAM-1 and sL-selectin, were higher in group B than in group A. sICAM-1 levels decreased in group A by 7% (p = 0.007) and in group B by 21% (p = 0.039), whereas levels of sVCAM-1 decreased in group A by 12% (p = 0.001) and in group B patients by 19% (p = 0.039). Atorvastatin did not change sE-selectin nor sP-selectin levels in group A. However, in group B, the treatment reduced E-selectin and sP-selectin levels by 39% (p = 0.007) and 24% (p = 0.007), respectively. Atorvastatin attenuates the inflammatory reaction in hypercholesterolemic patients, but in patients with LDLR gene polymorphism, this effect is more profound. Copyright 2008 S. Karger AG, Basel.

          Related collections

          Most cited references29

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Effect of intensive compared with moderate lipid-lowering therapy on progression of coronary atherosclerosis: a randomized controlled trial.

          Statin drugs reduce both atherogenic lipoproteins and cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. However, the optimal strategy and target level for lipid reduction remain uncertain. To compare the effect of regimens designed to produce intensive lipid lowering or moderate lipid lowering on coronary artery atheroma burden and progression. Double-blind, randomized active control multicenter trial (Reversal of Atherosclerosis with Aggressive Lipid Lowering [REVERSAL]) performed at 34 community and tertiary care centers in the United States comparing the effects of 2 different statins administered for 18 months. Intravascular ultrasound was used to measure progression of atherosclerosis. Between June 1999 and September 2001, 654 patients were randomized and received study drug; 502 had evaluable intravascular ultrasound examinations at baseline and after 18 months of treatment. Patients were randomly assigned to receive a moderate lipid-lowering regimen consisting of 40 mg of pravastatin or an intensive lipid-lowering regimen consisting of 80 mg of atorvastatin. The primary efficacy parameter was the percentage change in atheroma volume (follow-up minus baseline). Baseline low-density lipoprotein cholesterol level (mean, 150.2 mg/dL [3.89 mmol/L] in both treatment groups) was reduced to 110 mg/dL (2.85 mmol/L) in the pravastatin group and to 79 mg/dL (2.05 mmol/L) in the atorvastatin group (P<.001). C-reactive protein decreased 5.2% with pravastatin and 36.4% with atorvastatin (P<.001). The primary end point (percentage change in atheroma volume) showed a significantly lower progression rate in the atorvastatin (intensive) group (P =.02). Similar differences between groups were observed for secondary efficacy parameters, including change in total atheroma volume (P =.02), change in percentage atheroma volume (P<.001), and change in atheroma volume in the most severely diseased 10-mm vessel subsegment (P<.01). For the primary end point, progression of coronary atherosclerosis occurred in the pravastatin group (2.7%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.2% to 4.7%; P =.001) compared with baseline. Progression did not occur in the atorvastatin group (-0.4%; CI -2.4% to 1.5%; P =.98) compared with baseline. For patients with coronary heart disease, intensive lipid-lowering treatment with atorvastatin reduced progression of coronary atherosclerosis compared with pravastatin. Compared with baseline values, patients treated with atorvastatin had no change in atheroma burden, whereas patients treated with pravastatin showed progression of coronary atherosclerosis. These differences may be related to the greater reduction in atherogenic lipoproteins and C- reactive protein in patients treated with atorvastatin.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Effect of Statin Therapy on C-Reactive Protein Levels

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found

              Utility of endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration in patients with tuberculous intrathoracic lymphadenopathy: a multicentre study

              Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) has emerged as an important tool for the diagnosis and staging of lung cancer but its role in the diagnosis of tuberculous intrathoracic lymphadenopathy has not been established. The aim of this study was to describe the diagnostic utility of EBUS-TBNA in patients with intrathoracic lymphadenopathy due to tuberculosis (TB). 156 consecutive patients with isolated intrathoracic TB lymphadenitis were studied across four centres over a 2-year period. Only patients with a confirmed diagnosis or unequivocal clinical and radiological response to antituberculous treatment during follow-up for a minimum of 6 months were included. All patients underwent routine clinical assessment and a CT scan prior to EBUS-TBNA. Demographic data, HIV status, pathological findings and microbiological results were recorded. EBUS-TBNA was diagnostic of TB in 146 patients (94%; 95% CI 88% to 97%). Pathological findings were consistent with TB in 134 patients (86%). Microbiological investigations yielded a positive culture of TB in 74 patients (47%) with a median time to positive culture of 16 days (range 3-84) and identified eight drug-resistant cases (5%). Ten patients (6%) did not have a specific diagnosis following EBUS; four underwent mediastinoscopy which confirmed the diagnosis of TB while six responded to empirical antituberculous therapy. There was one complication requiring an inpatient admission. EBUS-TBNA is a safe and effective first-line investigation in patients with tuberculous intrathoracic lymphadenopathy.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Comments

                Comment on this article