52
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Penalties for success: reactions to women who succeed at male gender-typed tasks.

      The Journal of applied psychology
      Adult, Career Mobility, Female, Gender Identity, Hostility, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Job Description, Male, Prejudice

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          A total of 242 subjects participated in 3 experimental studies investigating reactions to a woman's success in a male gender-typed job. Results strongly supported the authors' hypotheses, indicating that (a) when women are acknowledged to have been successful, they are less liked and more personally derogated than equivalently successful men (Studies 1 and 2); (b) these negative reactions occur only when the success is in an arena that is distinctly male in character (Study 2); and (c) being disliked can have career-affecting outcomes, both for overall evaluation and for recommendations concerning organizational reward allocation (Study 3). These results were taken to support the idea that gender stereotypes can prompt bias in evaluative judgments of women even when these women have proved themselves to be successful and demonstrated their competence. The distinction between prescriptive and descriptive aspects of gender stereotypes is considered, as well as the implications of prescriptive gender norms for women in work settings. (c) 2004 APA

          Related collections

          Most cited references24

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Description and Prescription: How Gender Stereotypes Prevent Women's Ascent Up the Organizational Ladder

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Prescriptive Gender Stereotypes and Backlash Toward Agentic Women

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Self-promotion as a risk factor for women: the costs and benefits of counterstereotypical impression management.

              Three experiments tested and extended recent theory regarding motivational influences on impression formation (S. T. Fiske & S. L. Neuberg, 1990; J. L. Hilton & J. M. Darley, 1991) in the context of an impression management dilemma that women face: Self-promotion may be instrumental for managing a competent impression, yet women who self-promote may suffer social reprisals for violating gender prescriptions to be modest. Experiment 1 investigated the influence of perceivers' goals on processes that inhibit stereotypical thinking, and reactions to counterstereotypical behavior. Experiments 2-3 extended these findings by including male targets. For female targets, self-promotion led to higher competence ratings but incurred social attraction and hireability costs unless perceivers were outcome-dependent males. For male targets, self-effacement decreased competence and hireability ratings, though its effects on social attraction were inconsistent.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                15161402
                10.1037/0021-9010.89.3.416

                Chemistry
                Adult,Career Mobility,Female,Gender Identity,Hostility,Humans,Interpersonal Relations,Job Description,Male,Prejudice

                Comments

                Comment on this article