47
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Uncovering shared common genetic risk factors for various aspects of complex disorders captured in multiple traits

      Preprint

      Read this article at

          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Identifying shared genetic risk factors for multiple measured traits has been of great interest in studying complex disorders. Marlow's (2003) method for detecting shared gene effects on complex traits has been highly influential in the literature of neurodevelopmental disorders as well as other disorders including obesity and asthma. Although its method has been widely applied and has been recommended as potentially powerful, the validity and power of this method have not been examined either theoretically or by simulation. This paper establishes the validity and quantifies and explains the power of the method. We show the method has correct type 1 error rates regardless of the number of traits in the model, and confirm power increases compared to standard univariate methods across different genetic models. We discover the main source of these power gains is correlations among traits induced by a common major gene effect component. We compare the use of the complete pleiotropy model, as assumed by Marlow, to the use of a more general model allowing additional correlation parameters, and find that even when the true model includes those parameters, the complete pleiotropy model is more powerful as long as traits are moderately correlated by a major gene component. We implement this method and a power calculator in software that can assist in designing studies by using pilot data to calculate required sample sizes and choose traits for further linkage studies. We apply the software to data on reading disability in the Russian language.

          Related collections

          Most cited references28

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          A developmental model for similarities and dissimilarities between schizophrenia and bipolar disorder.

          Schizophrenia and mania have a number of symptoms and epidemiological characteristics in common, and both respond to dopamine blockade. Family, twin and molecular genetic studies suggest that the reason for these similarities may be that the two conditions share certain susceptibility genes. On the other hand, individuals with schizophrenia have more obvious brain structural and neuropsychological abnormalities than those with bipolar disorder; and pre-schizophrenic children are characterised by cognitive and neuromotor impairments, which are not shared by children who later develop bipolar disorder. Furthermore, the risk-increasing effect of obstetric complications has been demonstrated for schizophrenia but not for bipolar disorder. Perinatal complications such as hypoxia are known to result in smaller volume of the amygdala and hippocampus, which have been frequently reported to be reduced in schizophrenia; familial predisposition to schizophrenia is also associated with decreased volume of these structures. We suggest a model to explain the similarities and differences between the disorders and propose that, on a background of shared genetic predisposition to psychosis, schizophrenia, but not bipolar disorder, is subject to additional genes or early insults, which impair neurodevelopment, especially of the medial temporal lobe.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Bivariate quantitative trait linkage analysis: pleiotropy versus co-incident linkages.

            Power to detect linkage and localization of a major gene were compared in univariate and bivariate variance components linkage analysis of three related quantitative traits in general pedigrees. Although both methods demonstrated adequate power to detect loci of moderate effect, bivariate analysis improved both power and localization for correlated quantitative traits mapping to the same chromosomal region, regardless of whether co-localization was the result of pleiotropy. Additionally, a test of pleiotropy versus co-incident linkage was shown to have adequate power and a low error rate.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Generalist genes: implications for the cognitive sciences.

              In the 'generalist genes' hypothesis, it is suggested that the same genes affect most cognitive abilities and disabilities. This recently proposed hypothesis is based on considerable multivariate genetic research showing that there is substantial genetic overlap between such broad areas of cognition as language, reading, mathematics and general cognitive ability. We assume that the hypothesis is correct and consider here its implications for cognitive neuroscience. In our opinion, the two key genetic concepts of pleiotropy (in which one gene affects many traits) and polygenicity (in which many genes affect a trait) that underlie the generalist genes hypothesis imply a 'generalist brain'. That is, the genetic input into brain structure and function is general not specific.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                0904.2229

                Methodology
                Methodology

                Comments

                Comment on this article