8
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Clinical trials recruitment planning: A proposed framework from the Clinical Trials Transformation Initiative.

      Read this article at

          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Patient recruitment is widely recognized as a key determinant of success for clinical trials. Yet a substantial number of trials fail to reach recruitment goals-a situation that has important scientific, financial, ethical, and policy implications. Further, there are important effects on stakeholders who directly contribute to the trial including investigators, sponsors, and study participants. Despite efforts over multiple decades to identify and address barriers, recruitment challenges persist. To advance a more comprehensive approach to trial recruitment, the Clinical Trials Transformation Initiative (CTTI) convened a project team to examine the challenges and to issue actionable, evidence-based recommendations for improving recruitment planning that extend beyond common study-specific strategies. We describe our multi-stakeholder effort to develop a framework that delineates three areas essential to strategic recruitment planning efforts: (1) trial design and protocol development, (2) trial feasibility and site selection, and (3) communication. Our recommendations propose an upstream approach to recruitment planning that has the potential to produce greater impact and reduce downstream barriers. Additionally, we offer tools to help facilitate adoption of the recommendations. We hope that our framework and recommendations will serve as a guide for initial efforts in clinical trial recruitment planning irrespective of disease or intervention focus, provide a common basis for discussions in this area and generate targets for further analysis and continual improvement.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          Contemp Clin Trials
          Contemporary clinical trials
          Elsevier BV
          1559-2030
          1551-7144
          Mar 2018
          : 66
          Affiliations
          [1 ] Cooperative Studies Program, Office of Research & Development, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, 810 Vermont Ave NW, Washington, DC 20420, USA. Electronic address: grant.huang@va.gov.
          [2 ] PPDi, 929 North Front Street, Wilmington, NC 28401, USA.
          [3 ] Eli Lilly and Company, Lilly Corporate Center, Indianapolis, IN 46285, USA. Electronic address: kelly.mckee@lilly.com.
          [4 ] Janssen Research & Development, 700 US Highway 202, Raritan, NJ 08869, USA. Electronic address: EMahon01@its.jnj.com.
          [5 ] Association of Clinical Research Professionals, 99 Canal Center Plaza, Alexandria, VA 22314, USA. Electronic address: Beth.harper@acrpnet.org.
          [6 ] Duke University, 300 W. Morgan St., Durham, NC 27701, USA. Electronic address: jamie.roberts@duke.edu.
          Article
          S1551-7144(17)30753-X
          10.1016/j.cct.2018.01.003
          29330082
          373142df-b5b2-4bd2-ad48-a55fef83c3bf
          History

          Clinical trials,Stakeholder engagement,Retention,Recruitment,Quality by Design

          Comments

          Comment on this article