Hand-grip strength of young men, women and highly trained female athletes

To determine reference ranges for peak, average, and final adult grip strength over 10 seconds by using an electronic dynamometer, and to compare results from hydraulic and electronic dynamometers. The hand-grip strengths of 476 healthy adult subjects were tested using the electronic (Grippit; AB Detektor, Goteborg, Sweden) and hydraulic (Jamar; Smith and Nephew, Memphis, TN) dynamometers. Age- and gender-specific reference ranges for the Jamar and Grippit dynamometers are presented. Bland-Altman analysis of the differences between the results obtained using the 2 instruments revealed a bias (mean difference) of 22 N (Jamar - Grippit) and limits of agreement of -86 to 129 N (mean +/- 2 SD), which indicates that grip measurements may vary by up to 215 N between instruments. The study yielded population reference ranges of peak, average, and final strength over a 10-second grip assessment using an electronic dynamometer. Results from the Grippit and Jamar dynamometers are similar; however, the dynamometers cannot be interchanged. The Grippit provides information about endurance and fatigue of grip over 10 seconds, showing differences between right- and left-dominant adults.

Skeletal muscle development is one of the key features of childhood and adolescence. Determining maximal isometric grip force (MIGF) using a hand-held Jamar dynamometer is a simple method to quantify one aspect of muscle function. Presently available reference data present MIGF as a function of chronological age. However, muscle force is largely determined by body size, and many children undergoing muscle performance tests in the clinical setting suffer from growth retardation secondary to a chronic disorder. Reference data were established from simple regressions between age or log height and log MIGF in a population of 315 healthy children and adolescents aged 6 to 19 y (157 girls). These data were used to calculate age- or height-dependent SD scores (SDS) for MIGF in three pediatric patient groups. In renal graft recipients (n = 14), the age-dependent MIGF SDS was markedly decreased (-2.5 +/- 1.9; mean +/- SD). However, these patients had short stature (height SDS, -2.5 +/- 1.2), and the height-dependent MIGF SDS was close to normal (-0.4 +/- 1.5). Similarly, in cystic fibrosis patients (n = 13) age-dependent MIGF SDS was -1.6 +/- 1.6, but height-dependent MIGF SDS was -0.5 +/- 1.1. Children with epilepsy who were taking anticonvulsant therapy (n = 34) had normal stature, and consequently age- and height-dependent MIGF SDS were similar (0.4 +/- 1.0 and 0.4 +/- 0.8, respectively). In conclusion, MIGF determination provides information on an important aspect of physical development. Height should be taken into account to avoid misinterpretation.

The aims of the present study were: (1) to collect normative data of pinch and power grip strength with a newer digital dynamometer; (2) to study the ability of hand grip force matching using a hand dynamometer where the validity and reliability issues were studied; and (3) to study the relationship between hand grip force matching and muscle activities of three forearm and hand muscles. This study consisted of two experiments. One hundred and twenty subjects volunteered in the first experiment, where hand grip strength and hand force estimation data were collected. The second experiment had 14 volunteers, where muscle activities of the hand and forearm were collected during the tests of hand grip strength and hand force matching estimations. Results showed that the power grip and pinch grip strengths collected with a newer digital dynamometer were comparable to similar studies using older equipment. At the group level, the force matching method was largely accurate and consistent. Instructions to the subjects about force matching estimation were important to the accuracy and consistency of the estimated forces. Estimation in force matching might depend on perceptions of several major muscle activities.